Merchants traded slaves just like they traded any sort of good. That's true for Jews, Greeks, overseas Chinese and every other group that traded in goods.
Now if you start blaming modern day Jews for that, then that's anti-semitic. However, if a Jew starts attacking white people, then the obvious reply is: "well, if you hate white people because some white guy 300 years ago did X, then how about those Jewish slave ships?" What's good for the goose...
The problem is when jews in the media blame Whites for slavery when even in the US South almost all the cotton and sugar slave farms were owned by jews.
They try and turn blacks against the White middle-class just like they turned the lower class against the middle in the 1917 Russian Revolution.
Very few White people ever owned slaves in the United States. That was all a Hollywood psyop with movies like Roots that jews made to form that mindset.
even in the US South almost all the cotton and sugar slave farms were owned by jews.
Almost all? I don't believe you, nor your footnote-less source. Name ten.
Very few White people ever owned slaves in the United States. That was all a Hollywood psyop with movies like Roots that jews made to form that mindset.
Almost all? I don't believe you, nor your footnote-less source. Name ten.
I'm not the OP, but Jewish merchants and plantation owners were disproportionate in terms of how many slaves they owned and how many ships they ran. "Almost all" is horse shit, but there were many.
As an example, the vice president of the Confederacy was Judah Benjamin.
Hah, there is a Wikipedia category "Jewish-American Slave Owners" though I imagine it needs fleshed out a bit.
Only a single digit percentage of people did
I don't know about that either. It was relatively common in the south to have a single house slave. The plantations we think of with 100s of slaves were very rare.
Ah can assure you, we didn't have no fuckin house niggers, and this defamation needs to fucking stop. MAYBE, if you're talking about soft southern lords in Charleston, Atlanta, etc. but Appalachia couldn't afford to feed themselves let alone a whole ass human.
It's not anti-semitic at all.
Merchants traded slaves just like they traded any sort of good. That's true for Jews, Greeks, overseas Chinese and every other group that traded in goods.
Now if you start blaming modern day Jews for that, then that's anti-semitic. However, if a Jew starts attacking white people, then the obvious reply is: "well, if you hate white people because some white guy 300 years ago did X, then how about those Jewish slave ships?" What's good for the goose...
The problem is when jews in the media blame Whites for slavery when even in the US South almost all the cotton and sugar slave farms were owned by jews.
They try and turn blacks against the White middle-class just like they turned the lower class against the middle in the 1917 Russian Revolution.
Very few White people ever owned slaves in the United States. That was all a Hollywood psyop with movies like Roots that jews made to form that mindset.
Almost all? I don't believe you, nor your footnote-less source. Name ten.
This is literal insanity.
I'm not the OP, but Jewish merchants and plantation owners were disproportionate in terms of how many slaves they owned and how many ships they ran. "Almost all" is horse shit, but there were many.
As an example, the vice president of the Confederacy was Judah Benjamin.
Hah, there is a Wikipedia category "Jewish-American Slave Owners" though I imagine it needs fleshed out a bit.
I don't know about that either. It was relatively common in the south to have a single house slave. The plantations we think of with 100s of slaves were very rare.
Ah can assure you, we didn't have no fuckin house niggers, and this defamation needs to fucking stop. MAYBE, if you're talking about soft southern lords in Charleston, Atlanta, etc. but Appalachia couldn't afford to feed themselves let alone a whole ass human.