Women invariably break the escalation of force pattern because they lack the testosterone and the life experience men have that allows them to utilize violence in a more controlled manner. When placed in a position of authority, whether that position is command or on the front lines, they either underestimate the required level of force and then overcompensate, or skip the mutual negotiation stage and skip right to overwhelming and unnecessary violence.
Not all men understand violence on an instinctual level, but most can at least intuit something along the lines of 'shout, show, shoot' and the seriousness of escalating an encounter.
What I've learned from my lifetime of conflict with women is:
they are mega bitches and aggressive, moreso than men, when they don't feel physically intimidated/threatened [studies show women road rage more than men]
if they don't think they can take you, they will try to manipulate a man to fight for them
they will gladly bait you into hitting them if they think you hitting them is a win condition for them
they will burst escalate against you in "harpy" mode and screech and go apeshit on you thinking they can back you down with their little "crazy" display
THEY CANNOT SUSTAIN and burn out fast, while men can keep going on and on forever. If a woman really pisses me off, I just verbally berate her constantly for an extended period of time, and just drown her in my energy. She can't keep up at all. She collapses. She folds.
Even with all of the above, if society wasn't rigged to nuke men if men hit women, then men could in general slap the bitch even when she was in harpy mode and still win. The end result would be that women would act more docile and less aggressive against men and adopt strategies contrary to anger and violence since they knew going down that road was a sure loser for them. IMO society would be better in that equilibrium than the one we have now, and I don't think some women getting smacked around is the great tragedy that feminazi-indoctrinated society thinks it is.
Think about it, large men physically intimidate smaller men all the time. I'm a relatively brave guy and I don't take shit, but if a dude is much bigger than me, I'm not going to engage with him down any kind of physical path because I'm not an idiot. I'm going to shift strategies away from violence.
The fact that women know they can hit you and you can't hit them back actually leads to MORE domestic violence versus if men could just hit women. If men could hit women, at most it would happen once because the woman would learn her lesson. And if the man was the aggressor, the woman could just break up with him. All this nonsense about how women are "trapped" is total garbage. The truth is that some women actually seek out and stay with abusers of their own accord because the woman is fucked in the head, and even if the man can't be violent, he can still beat her down verbally.
60 million aborted babies have turned women’s bodies into bloodlands. Free access to murder unpunished is still subject to the law of unintended consequences. Many many women take advantage of their newfound illegitimate power with zero contemplation. We are seeing how it goes.
I do wonder what this has done to women psychologically. One of the principles of early game was that women were reverting to a feral nature, but I am not convinced that is true. Cavewoman who behaved like this would have died out, there were consequences throughout most of history for women's behavior. I am wondering if all of these protections and rights have turned a good chunk of women into demonic beings, into creatures who would have rightly been called witches in saner times.
Women invariably break the escalation of force pattern because they lack the testosterone and the life experience men have that allows them to utilize violence in a more controlled manner. When placed in a position of authority, whether that position is command or on the front lines, they either underestimate the required level of force and then overcompensate, or skip the mutual negotiation stage and skip right to overwhelming and unnecessary violence.
Not all men understand violence on an instinctual level, but most can at least intuit something along the lines of 'shout, show, shoot' and the seriousness of escalating an encounter.
What I've learned from my lifetime of conflict with women is:
they are mega bitches and aggressive, moreso than men, when they don't feel physically intimidated/threatened [studies show women road rage more than men]
if they don't think they can take you, they will try to manipulate a man to fight for them
they will gladly bait you into hitting them if they think you hitting them is a win condition for them
they will burst escalate against you in "harpy" mode and screech and go apeshit on you thinking they can back you down with their little "crazy" display
THEY CANNOT SUSTAIN and burn out fast, while men can keep going on and on forever. If a woman really pisses me off, I just verbally berate her constantly for an extended period of time, and just drown her in my energy. She can't keep up at all. She collapses. She folds.
Even with all of the above, if society wasn't rigged to nuke men if men hit women, then men could in general slap the bitch even when she was in harpy mode and still win. The end result would be that women would act more docile and less aggressive against men and adopt strategies contrary to anger and violence since they knew going down that road was a sure loser for them. IMO society would be better in that equilibrium than the one we have now, and I don't think some women getting smacked around is the great tragedy that feminazi-indoctrinated society thinks it is.
Think about it, large men physically intimidate smaller men all the time. I'm a relatively brave guy and I don't take shit, but if a dude is much bigger than me, I'm not going to engage with him down any kind of physical path because I'm not an idiot. I'm going to shift strategies away from violence.
The fact that women know they can hit you and you can't hit them back actually leads to MORE domestic violence versus if men could just hit women. If men could hit women, at most it would happen once because the woman would learn her lesson. And if the man was the aggressor, the woman could just break up with him. All this nonsense about how women are "trapped" is total garbage. The truth is that some women actually seek out and stay with abusers of their own accord because the woman is fucked in the head, and even if the man can't be violent, he can still beat her down verbally.
60 million aborted babies have turned women’s bodies into bloodlands. Free access to murder unpunished is still subject to the law of unintended consequences. Many many women take advantage of their newfound illegitimate power with zero contemplation. We are seeing how it goes.
I do wonder what this has done to women psychologically. One of the principles of early game was that women were reverting to a feral nature, but I am not convinced that is true. Cavewoman who behaved like this would have died out, there were consequences throughout most of history for women's behavior. I am wondering if all of these protections and rights have turned a good chunk of women into demonic beings, into creatures who would have rightly been called witches in saner times.
Witch = Lesbian is not something feminists invented in the 70s. It's their origin like trolls and downs/gigantism or changelings and autism/bipolar
It’s unnatural that’s for sure. To murder one’s own children goes against our biological purpose. I would say yes to your assessment.