There isn’t supposed to be a “win”; from the point of view of the American neo-cons steering us into this mess, it’s about cultivating another never-ending conflict they can use to launder money with. They had to get something rolling after they lost their gig in Afghanistan.
There isn’t supposed to be a “win”; from the point of view of the American neo-cons steering us into this mess, it’s about cultivating another never-ending conflict they can use to launder money with. They had to get something rolling after they lost their gig in Afghanistan.
That's pretty much why I asked that question. Unending war, for the sole purpose of propping up Raytheon, is a tough sell, electorally.