Don't repeat feminist lies and propaganda. Most men are not deadbeats unless they are negros. Single parents is a woman created problem because women cause men to breakup with them or they initiate it themselves because of their unchecked entitlement. Things like child support and alimony give incentive for women to act poorly. Why would a man knowing cause the end of a marriage when he will have to pay for the woman he hates? Deadbeat dads is a joke. The fathers are victims of the gynocracy.
So if "most men" are not deadbeats, why are you trying to incentivize it and protect them?
Single parents is a woman created problem because women cause men to breakup with them or they initiate it themselves because of their unchecked entitlement.
LOL! You must be friends with Impy. When the man breaks up, it's the woman's fault, when the woman breaks up, it's the woman's fault! Nuclear war? WOMEN'S FAULT!
Things like child support and alimony give incentive for women to act poorly.
And no child support at all gives men incentive to act poorly.
Why would a man knowing cause the end of a marriage when he will have to pay for the woman he hates? Deadbeat dads is a joke. The fathers are victims of the gynocracy.
Tony, where I live women get paid more the less the father sees the child.
Want to guess on the outcome of that? I'll give you a hint: I've twice had to defend myself from accusations of being a child molester, both made by the same person. Both thrown out of court for having no evidence of any kind. This is a technique that is called "The Silver Bullet" in the USA. Hitting a guy with both a child custody and criminal prosecution at the same time. Women literally teach it to each other in internet forums. Well, it failed the first time (thought it took two years to beat) and the second time was to punish me for asking to see my daughter more. My experience is far from unusual. One conversation with any family lawyer in the field will paint a really consistent picture of the realities.
Women keep the kids in 80% of breakups. If she does keep the children, she is entitled to more of the assets of the union. Here, with two kids she can claim 80% of the assets in a property settlement, plus child support (which is highest if the father has no shared custody) plus she becomes entitled to a government pension until the youngest of the children turn thirteen. Women weaponize the sympathetic court system to get paid. These are facts.
If women want mens' money, then they should negotiate for it. You want no fault divorce? Fine, it shouldn't come bundled with indentured servitude at the threat of jail time (in the USA). Men should be able to negotiate.
If a woman can't solely support the kids, then she should share custody or (gasp) let them be with their dad, who can certainly support them in almost every case. Remember that the Dad's parents probably want to see their grandkids. They can offer help and support, if they want. Right now they are almost entirely cut out.
Your idea that men would walk away and let their kids starve... Holy fuck. Even in the distant past, before this awful situation, that was rare. Mostly what happened was fathers raised their kids, after proving that the mother was at fault for the divorce. If the man was shown to be at fault, then they had to pay.
For a raging faggot you sure are a god damned simp.
I don't want women in the military. What we should be doing is writing to have alimony and child support removed from the legal system entirely.
I too support a Deadbeat Dad Bill of Rights.
Don't repeat feminist lies and propaganda. Most men are not deadbeats unless they are negros. Single parents is a woman created problem because women cause men to breakup with them or they initiate it themselves because of their unchecked entitlement. Things like child support and alimony give incentive for women to act poorly. Why would a man knowing cause the end of a marriage when he will have to pay for the woman he hates? Deadbeat dads is a joke. The fathers are victims of the gynocracy.
So if "most men" are not deadbeats, why are you trying to incentivize it and protect them?
LOL! You must be friends with Impy. When the man breaks up, it's the woman's fault, when the woman breaks up, it's the woman's fault! Nuclear war? WOMEN'S FAULT!
And no child support at all gives men incentive to act poorly.
You're literally batshit crazy.
Tony, where I live women get paid more the less the father sees the child.
Want to guess on the outcome of that? I'll give you a hint: I've twice had to defend myself from accusations of being a child molester, both made by the same person. Both thrown out of court for having no evidence of any kind. This is a technique that is called "The Silver Bullet" in the USA. Hitting a guy with both a child custody and criminal prosecution at the same time. Women literally teach it to each other in internet forums. Well, it failed the first time (thought it took two years to beat) and the second time was to punish me for asking to see my daughter more. My experience is far from unusual. One conversation with any family lawyer in the field will paint a really consistent picture of the realities.
Women keep the kids in 80% of breakups. If she does keep the children, she is entitled to more of the assets of the union. Here, with two kids she can claim 80% of the assets in a property settlement, plus child support (which is highest if the father has no shared custody) plus she becomes entitled to a government pension until the youngest of the children turn thirteen. Women weaponize the sympathetic court system to get paid. These are facts.
If women want mens' money, then they should negotiate for it. You want no fault divorce? Fine, it shouldn't come bundled with indentured servitude at the threat of jail time (in the USA). Men should be able to negotiate.
If a woman can't solely support the kids, then she should share custody or (gasp) let them be with their dad, who can certainly support them in almost every case. Remember that the Dad's parents probably want to see their grandkids. They can offer help and support, if they want. Right now they are almost entirely cut out.
Your idea that men would walk away and let their kids starve... Holy fuck. Even in the distant past, before this awful situation, that was rare. Mostly what happened was fathers raised their kids, after proving that the mother was at fault for the divorce. If the man was shown to be at fault, then they had to pay.
For a raging faggot you sure are a god damned simp.