The plan’s influence extends outside the park and provides for ‘removal of infrastructure’ on overlooking spurs and ridges that impacts the purported ‘cultural values’. How many local residents with views of Mount Warning will need to relocate? How many power lines and communication towers will need to be demolished so a few are not offended?
‘Development within the views and vistas of Wollumbin AP could affect intervisibility to important cultural sites. Impacts could include things like building on spurs and ridges. Further suburban development within the views and vistas of Wollumbin AP will impact on the aesthetics, connection to Country and the cultural landscape which are integral to the cultural values of Wollumbin AP. Removal of infrastructure will occur once the summit is closed in the future.’
So simply living next door now counts as some injury to these cultural conquistadors...?
If they follow through with that threat, it means going onto private land and attempting to rip up infrastructure...
They do that, then surely, as pointed out elsewhere, that is the end of the rule of law...
To be fair, this whole "plan" seems like it would break anti-discrimination laws, among other things. So I'm really... Concerned where this is headed.
I really don't understand how they can do this. But here we are...
I know they've seized land under a form of "eminent domain", before, to convert it to national parks. For that seized land to now be "handed over" to the Aboriginals for their own private management..?
I'm not sure how that's particularly different to South Africa's farm seizures, tbh. It's just taken (much) longer...
Clearly the last two years were a watershed in Australian politics. Because this is just... I'm gonna go with "outrageous", but really that is the least of it.
So simply living next door now counts as some injury to these cultural conquistadors...?
I also don't understand this.
If they follow through with that threat, it means going onto private land and attempting to rip up infrastructure...
They do that, then surely, as pointed out elsewhere, that is the end of the rule of law...
To be fair, this whole "plan" seems like it would break anti-discrimination laws, among other things. So I'm really... Concerned where this is headed.
I really don't understand how they can do this. But here we are...
I know they've seized land under a form of "eminent domain", before, to convert it to national parks. For that seized land to now be "handed over" to the Aboriginals for their own private management..?
I'm not sure how that's particularly different to South Africa's farm seizures, tbh. It's just taken (much) longer...
Clearly the last two years were a watershed in Australian politics. Because this is just... I'm gonna go with "outrageous", but really that is the least of it.
Australia is a lost cause man. It has been for a long time.
Leave before you get raped/murdered by the local dindu population, or shoved on a train car by white people.