You're too hung up on a vaccine to see what's interesting here. Basic bitch censorship has trained the soccer mom demographic to be subversives.
Back when this whole internet thing kicked off the nerds were convinced it would create a new era of human dialogue. They were absurdly naive. What happened is that by the late 90s Intelligence services and NGOs has rigged the game. See: the history of google. By the time social media began to come on to the scene the powers that be already had the whole thing under lock and key. As far as the movers and shakers of culture and governance were concerned, they controlled the world. It was even better than the previous half century of mass media because the proles thought their ideas were their own.
The problem is some folks just won't buy in. We sit here on this "gamer" forum because a bunch of us were dragged kicking and screaming into political awareness. But who gives a shit right? It's video games.
Then came the experimental vaccine for a minor cold. A few parents, and it was only a few, said maybe don't give my kid this drug. Remember at this point the movers and shakers think they've more or less got this social control thing in the bag. So what do they do? They censor the few subversives. Problem is that as fat dumb and happy as the average moron is, they are not fat dumb and happy enough to risk their children.
This fat dumb and happy "mom demographic" didn't know they had subversive opinions until social medial began banning their posts. Now they know. Now they are adapting. Will these anti-vaxxers "save us"? No, but now they know that there is a "they" out there, and "they" may not have everyone's best interest in mind.
All that to say: thanks to wonton censorship, a bunch more people have discovered they have been thrown into the pit along with Gamgergate, the Alt-right, and whoever else progressives see fit to disagree with.
You're absolutely right Imp. I accidentally interpreted the word subversive backwards here, like he was saying censorship triggers the female urge to please authority and that the internet allows them to safely act as virtua-gestapo to please the censors.
Basically in my head, this effect caused this particular woman to jump the shark to serve her authorityology, seething from a feigned position of righteous authority about even wordless emojis being a medium for wrongthink. So like, subversive against humanity.
But I see now it's totally obvious he was saying the absolute opposite and that I am a turbo autist :P
Edit: that last part is not meant to sound sarcastic
Another article by Bloomberg here: https://archive.ph/jfOiF
The "alternate reality" is that these things that are clearly happening actually aren't.
You're too hung up on a vaccine to see what's interesting here. Basic bitch censorship has trained the soccer mom demographic to be subversives.
Back when this whole internet thing kicked off the nerds were convinced it would create a new era of human dialogue. They were absurdly naive. What happened is that by the late 90s Intelligence services and NGOs has rigged the game. See: the history of google. By the time social media began to come on to the scene the powers that be already had the whole thing under lock and key. As far as the movers and shakers of culture and governance were concerned, they controlled the world. It was even better than the previous half century of mass media because the proles thought their ideas were their own.
The problem is some folks just won't buy in. We sit here on this "gamer" forum because a bunch of us were dragged kicking and screaming into political awareness. But who gives a shit right? It's video games.
Then came the experimental vaccine for a minor cold. A few parents, and it was only a few, said maybe don't give my kid this drug. Remember at this point the movers and shakers think they've more or less got this social control thing in the bag. So what do they do? They censor the few subversives. Problem is that as fat dumb and happy as the average moron is, they are not fat dumb and happy enough to risk their children.
This fat dumb and happy "mom demographic" didn't know they had subversive opinions until social medial began banning their posts. Now they know. Now they are adapting. Will these anti-vaxxers "save us"? No, but now they know that there is a "they" out there, and "they" may not have everyone's best interest in mind.
All that to say: thanks to wonton censorship, a bunch more people have discovered they have been thrown into the pit along with Gamgergate, the Alt-right, and whoever else progressives see fit to disagree with.
Just like a certain dystopian fiction author depicted
Actually, Orwell predicted that women would have undying loyalty to The Party.
I have the quote somewhere.
You're absolutely right Imp. I accidentally interpreted the word subversive backwards here, like he was saying censorship triggers the female urge to please authority and that the internet allows them to safely act as virtua-gestapo to please the censors.
Basically in my head, this effect caused this particular woman to jump the shark to serve her authorityology, seething from a feigned position of righteous authority about even wordless emojis being a medium for wrongthink. So like, subversive against humanity.
But I see now it's totally obvious he was saying the absolute opposite and that I am a turbo autist :P
Edit: that last part is not meant to sound sarcastic