Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.
Does this mean as a white supremacist misogynist that non-whites and women can't testify against me because they might be willing to commit purgery against me?
Actually a fair point. Why should women be trusted to be honest about men, particularly men who share negative views of women...
Trials are supposed to be judged based on a jury of your peers. White men should not be judged by black women for example. Not should atheists be judging Christians etc... However modern degenerate egalitarian culture tries to pretend we're all peers but we aren't. The defendant has a good point, the problem is that they don't care about logical congruency.
But race rhetoric says white women are your peers because you're all white.
If I haven't committed a race crime, I'd rather have a black jury than a female one.
That's if you view race as the only hierarchy that matters. What's that word leftists use.... Intersectionality. For me personally, I would only consider a white man with a similar background to me, who has a similar IQ to me, a similar career and life path, a similar community and beliefs/values as being my peer.