I'd be opposed to that judgement if the shooting verifiably happened... and Alex was the perpetrator. It's an absurd sum even if it's a follow-up to a death penalty, let alone a guy asking questions about things that don't add up in the official narrative.
I'd be opposed to that judgement if the shooting verifiably happened... and Alex was the perpetrator. It's an absurd sum even if it's a follow-up to a death penalty, let alone a guy asking questions about things that don't add up in the official narrative.
That jury is out of their fucking minds.
At the point that the financial penalty is greater than his gross life-time earnings, then a death sentence is the only comparable sentence.
This is like sentencing Alex Jones to twenty consecutive death sentences.