It's practically unthinkable that this wasn't already there.
Or perhaps it already was. In Quebec, starting when I was 14, I had to sign documents accepting to receive medical treatments to treat my cancer. Until you're 13, your legal guardians make that decision for you, but from 14 on, it becomes your choice. I could have refused and died, and my parents wouldn't have been able to coerce the hospital or any doctor to veto my decision. And yet, Quebec still had experimental injection mandates. It seems that although yes, they couldn't force you to become a test subject and receive it, they could still fully get around the law by punishing everyone who declined. Because apparently, blackmailing you into making personal medical decisions is legal.
Any law intended to prevent a repeat of this situation would have to specifically mention that the government is not allowed to impose any form of restriction on people who elect to not undergo any medical procedure, and would have to specify that such citizens will still have full possession of their fundamental human rights.
Smith has talked about adding medical choice to the human rights code.
It's practically unthinkable that this wasn't already there.
Or perhaps it already was. In Quebec, starting when I was 14, I had to sign documents accepting to receive medical treatments to treat my cancer. Until you're 13, your legal guardians make that decision for you, but from 14 on, it becomes your choice. I could have refused and died, and my parents wouldn't have been able to coerce the hospital or any doctor to veto my decision. And yet, Quebec still had experimental injection mandates. It seems that although yes, they couldn't force you to become a test subject and receive it, they could still fully get around the law by punishing everyone who declined. Because apparently, blackmailing you into making personal medical decisions is legal.
Any law intended to prevent a repeat of this situation would have to specifically mention that the government is not allowed to impose any form of restriction on people who elect to not undergo any medical procedure, and would have to specify that such citizens will still have full possession of their fundamental human rights.