People doubted me, people called me insane, but I found the fucking quote.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Wow, Julie Bindel a radfem? Who knew?
'Dug up'? Such fancy phrasing you use for 'Googled'. Unless you didn't even do it yourself. Also, she is in no way an 'acolyte' of the 'Manifesto'. And if she were, considering that she is one of the leading anti-troon feminists, how does that make any sense for your precious 'Manifesto' to be pro-troon?
Is that so? I'm hardly an expert on the subject, but this would be a great counter to the people who try to give historical pedigree to their perversions.
You will either die in a mental hospital, or in prison for some horrible crime, unless you reform your insanity.
Boys don't "want to be girls" because of some sentence in this 'Manifesto' of yours. And there are more girls who have delusions of wanting to be boys.
Yeah, I'm sure.
Because Bindel is not actually anti-trans if you listen to her. She's anti-trans affecting women. She couldn't give a single fuck about boys being castrated. She's defending herself and her people from a circumstance that I don't think was believed to be likely in 1968, when the Manifesto was written.
Considering that you defend firing people for pointing out that men are men, neither are you. In fact, you are more pro-troon than she is.
Proof? Your mind-reading skills have always been superior to mine. Unfortunately, results are as good as those of your predictions.
LET MY PEOPLE GO!
I defend firing women. It's a sort of...malicious compliance with the rules they set for us. If offending women is worth firing because they're a protected class, then women better go by their own rules.
She's a radical feminist. How the hell do I need to speak further about her not caring about boys?
Women should be fired for telling the truth, namely that men are men? Sounds like something a... misogynist would say.
I don't use the term lightly, but you are one, as we all know.
Which rules were set by the woman you cheered getting fired?
Difficult, isn't it, having to prove your claims? Does J.K. Rowling care about her son or does she think of slitting his throat every time she sees her? Or does the billionaire just want to use him as an ATM as you always claim - like you did about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend when you were unable to show the "massive settlement" you claimed he got?