Just like the German government has its motivations, so do do you.
No, I don't. I'm unbiased on this issue. My loyalty is only to the truth. I see something misreported, especially with fearmongering, I push back. Simple as.
If the Germans were actually in a shitty position and were going to run out of gas, I would be making fun of them for their libtard energy policy. The fact that I'm pointing out that they were somewhat responsible in making sure their stockpiles were adequately supplied is actually an example of me showing loyalty to truth over partisanship. I would much prefer to mock Germany.
I think you might have some pangs of conscience if Germans start starving and have their country utterly wrecked because of some imperialist adventure over a constituent republic of the Soviet Union.
If Putin was going to launch a nuke, I'd say aim it at Paris or London so at least it wouldn't kill any white people.
Mr. "Bomb Moscow" is "unbiased". It's absurd. Like I said, contrary to your fantasies that you have me seething in anger, I actually appreciate you providing some balance to the Russiabottery here.
But you are not unbiased. No way, no how.
If the Germans were actually in a shitty position and were going to run out of gas, I would be making fun of them for their libtard energy policy.
It wasn't libtard energy policy that did this though. That merely enabled it.
I would much prefer to mock Germany.
Haha, look at the Gemrans screwing themselves over for my empire.
Well, yeah./
If Putin was going to launch a nuke, I'd say aim it at Paris or London so at least it wouldn't kill any white people.
The Russia/Ukraine war has nothing to do with whether Germany has enough stockpiles for the winter. I'm obviously unbiased on Germany energy stockpiles. The fact that I would have gone to war with Russia [though I admit the slow, grinding humiliation Russia has been dealt by Ukraine instead has been better] is irrelevant.
It wasn't libtard energy policy that did this though.
Of course it was. They shut down all their nuke plants and followed libtard environmentalist policies that caused them to switch to energy dependency on Russia in the first place.
Haha, look at the Gemrans screwing themselves over for my empire.
America doesn't have an empire, but if I was in charge, we would.
The Russia/Ukraine war has nothing to do with whether Germany has enough stockpiles for the winter
Russia has been squeezing Europe since late last year and has been driving up the pressure in retaliation for sanctions ever since. How on earth has it 'nothing to do'?
Of course it was. They shut down all their nuke plants and followed libtard environmentalist policies that caused them to switch to energy dependency on Russia in the first place.
Well, they switched back to coal in order to not have nuclear. There's no ideology in which that makes sense.
America doesn't have an empire, but if I was in charge, we would.
If you were, your empire would be somewhat less of a force for evil in the world.
It's called a joke.
Ah well, didn't recognize it as it wasn't very funny.
You seem to think I give the slightest of fucks about countries like Germany or France. I don't mind at all if they suffer as a result of their libtard policies, and in fact I prefer it. While I favor Ukraine over Russia, I am confident there is absolutely 0 chance of even cucks like Germany actually caving in to Russia because "muh gas" EVEN IF there was a critical shortage. It's simply too important to the "current thing" zeitgeist to cave in. Instead, the Germans would simply cope with things like subsidies and flex their buying power to take supplies away from other countries, while incessantly berating the German populace to stop using gas.
Europe doesn't care about or even like the United States. They liked Obama because he's a globohomo like them, but they despised Trump and lost their minds over him. I want a US that reflects Trump's policies over Obama's policies.
They are rivals who pretend to be friends because they want to exploit the US, in particular to exploit the defense spending of the US taxpayer and pervert it to their own selfish ends. When the enemies of Russia and China are vanquished, you will see over the next 50 years, the US and "Europe" [the libtard countries that dominate europe, not all of europe] become increasingly hostile and begin to behave more like rivals. We are only held together at present by the greater evils of Russia and Islamic terror. Some Euros care about Chinese aggression but most of them don't care because it's far away.
Also, again, my loyalty to the truth is paramount. I'm not a propagandist. I do not push lies for the sake of some misguided "greater good". I believe that if the truth reigns supreme, the libtards will lose. The enemies of a good and free world, like Putin and Xi, will lose. That is why Putin and Xi pay government employees and contractors to flood the internet with their lies.
So while you might disagree with me, every opinion I have is held by me solely because I truly believe it based on my own rigorous fact checking and ideology-free totality of knowledge. I consider people who have been captured by ideology to have a form of voluntary mental illness.
Well, they switched back to coal in order to not have nuclear. There's no ideology in which that makes sense.
They thought they were going to fill the gap with wind and solar, but it didn't work so they had to fall back on fossil fuels. Natural gas is the preferred libtard fossil fuel because it is seen as "cleaner" than coal, which they see as the worst. Hence why Germany turned to natural gas and Russia. Also, various libtard policies mean domestic production is shunned in favor of imports. We do the same thing in California. Here is a chart showing that since 2010, Germany has reduced coal but increased natural gas by 6.7 GW to cover the losses in nuclear. They massively ramped up solar and wind, but it's too unreliable because it doesn't produce power when people want/need it. So you need natural gas plants to cover the gap.
I googled why you think that about coal. It turns out that a lot of coal plants [~20] were scheduled to close this year and were in staged of decommissioning, and Germany postponed that because of their energy shortfall.
If you were, your empire would be somewhat less of a force for evil in the world.
Well I would certainly put a stop to globohomo and cultural imperialism. The United States would be a far more selfish and politically-realist country.
No, I don't. I'm unbiased on this issue. My loyalty is only to the truth. I see something misreported, especially with fearmongering, I push back. Simple as.
If the Germans were actually in a shitty position and were going to run out of gas, I would be making fun of them for their libtard energy policy. The fact that I'm pointing out that they were somewhat responsible in making sure their stockpiles were adequately supplied is actually an example of me showing loyalty to truth over partisanship. I would much prefer to mock Germany.
If Putin was going to launch a nuke, I'd say aim it at Paris or London so at least it wouldn't kill any white people.
Mr. "Bomb Moscow" is "unbiased". It's absurd. Like I said, contrary to your fantasies that you have me seething in anger, I actually appreciate you providing some balance to the Russiabottery here.
But you are not unbiased. No way, no how.
It wasn't libtard energy policy that did this though. That merely enabled it.
Haha, look at the Gemrans screwing themselves over for my empire.
Well, yeah./
wut? Are you a Stormfag now?
The Russia/Ukraine war has nothing to do with whether Germany has enough stockpiles for the winter. I'm obviously unbiased on Germany energy stockpiles. The fact that I would have gone to war with Russia [though I admit the slow, grinding humiliation Russia has been dealt by Ukraine instead has been better] is irrelevant.
Of course it was. They shut down all their nuke plants and followed libtard environmentalist policies that caused them to switch to energy dependency on Russia in the first place.
America doesn't have an empire, but if I was in charge, we would.
It's called a joke.
Russia has been squeezing Europe since late last year and has been driving up the pressure in retaliation for sanctions ever since. How on earth has it 'nothing to do'?
Well, they switched back to coal in order to not have nuclear. There's no ideology in which that makes sense.
If you were, your empire would be somewhat less of a force for evil in the world.
Ah well, didn't recognize it as it wasn't very funny.
You seem to think I give the slightest of fucks about countries like Germany or France. I don't mind at all if they suffer as a result of their libtard policies, and in fact I prefer it. While I favor Ukraine over Russia, I am confident there is absolutely 0 chance of even cucks like Germany actually caving in to Russia because "muh gas" EVEN IF there was a critical shortage. It's simply too important to the "current thing" zeitgeist to cave in. Instead, the Germans would simply cope with things like subsidies and flex their buying power to take supplies away from other countries, while incessantly berating the German populace to stop using gas.
Europe doesn't care about or even like the United States. They liked Obama because he's a globohomo like them, but they despised Trump and lost their minds over him. I want a US that reflects Trump's policies over Obama's policies.
They are rivals who pretend to be friends because they want to exploit the US, in particular to exploit the defense spending of the US taxpayer and pervert it to their own selfish ends. When the enemies of Russia and China are vanquished, you will see over the next 50 years, the US and "Europe" [the libtard countries that dominate europe, not all of europe] become increasingly hostile and begin to behave more like rivals. We are only held together at present by the greater evils of Russia and Islamic terror. Some Euros care about Chinese aggression but most of them don't care because it's far away.
Also, again, my loyalty to the truth is paramount. I'm not a propagandist. I do not push lies for the sake of some misguided "greater good". I believe that if the truth reigns supreme, the libtards will lose. The enemies of a good and free world, like Putin and Xi, will lose. That is why Putin and Xi pay government employees and contractors to flood the internet with their lies.
So while you might disagree with me, every opinion I have is held by me solely because I truly believe it based on my own rigorous fact checking and ideology-free totality of knowledge. I consider people who have been captured by ideology to have a form of voluntary mental illness.
They thought they were going to fill the gap with wind and solar, but it didn't work so they had to fall back on fossil fuels. Natural gas is the preferred libtard fossil fuel because it is seen as "cleaner" than coal, which they see as the worst. Hence why Germany turned to natural gas and Russia. Also, various libtard policies mean domestic production is shunned in favor of imports. We do the same thing in California. Here is a chart showing that since 2010, Germany has reduced coal but increased natural gas by 6.7 GW to cover the losses in nuclear. They massively ramped up solar and wind, but it's too unreliable because it doesn't produce power when people want/need it. So you need natural gas plants to cover the gap.
I googled why you think that about coal. It turns out that a lot of coal plants [~20] were scheduled to close this year and were in staged of decommissioning, and Germany postponed that because of their energy shortfall.
Well I would certainly put a stop to globohomo and cultural imperialism. The United States would be a far more selfish and politically-realist country.