You can’t “marry” someone of the same sex. It completely refutes the entire concept. It’s like saying gay people can have sexual intercourse, it’s biologically infeasible because you need two separate sexual organs joined to have sex. Your mouth and asshole are not sexual organs which is why we have words like sodomy and fellatio. Those words are universal because both men and women have those organs.
I remember debating on Reddits ask a conservative that if they created a new definition it would not have received the same vitriol, the person ceded the point and then immediately said isn’t it more important to just let it happen so “society can progress”? My reply was, only if we can redefine cardiac to include the asshole and have diarrhea listed as a heart attack.
There was this gay couple I talked to once and they were angry to the point of unhinged rage when I told them they were biological dead-ends if they continued the gay relationship because they could not have a child without outside interference.
They can never have a child. Even if one does conceive a child it will not have the genetics of both “parents”. That’s why gay couples with money pay for two surrogates one for each, which is even more of a joke because if one is a boy and the other is a girl they could breed with each other without any risk of inbreeding, despite being “siblings”. The bastardization of medical terms for convenience is one of the worst frauds perpetrated on the human populace.
You can’t “marry” someone of the same sex. It completely refutes the entire concept. It’s like saying gay people can have sexual intercourse, it’s biologically infeasible because you need two separate sexual organs joined to have sex. Your mouth and asshole are not sexual organs which is why we have words like sodomy and fellatio. Those words are universal because both men and women have those organs.
Not so fast. If we CHANGE the definition of words, we can do all sorts of crazy things.
I remember debating on Reddits ask a conservative that if they created a new definition it would not have received the same vitriol, the person ceded the point and then immediately said isn’t it more important to just let it happen so “society can progress”? My reply was, only if we can redefine cardiac to include the asshole and have diarrhea listed as a heart attack.
There was this gay couple I talked to once and they were angry to the point of unhinged rage when I told them they were biological dead-ends if they continued the gay relationship because they could not have a child without outside interference.
They can never have a child. Even if one does conceive a child it will not have the genetics of both “parents”. That’s why gay couples with money pay for two surrogates one for each, which is even more of a joke because if one is a boy and the other is a girl they could breed with each other without any risk of inbreeding, despite being “siblings”. The bastardization of medical terms for convenience is one of the worst frauds perpetrated on the human populace.