What is most interesting is that he is now openly calling out European 'leaders' as slaves and vassals. It's almost as if he follows KiA2 (I'm kidding of course), because I have been calling them exactly that for a while now.
You've been calling them that because Putin has been feeding this same propaganda to people like you for a long time now. He's just saying it more openly now.
being slaves to the Empire rather than serving their own people.
What exactly does "serving their own people" look like to you, in terms of policy? Is it just being anti-immigration and anti-globohomo and against free trade, or what? Because pretty much everyone on the Right is already in favor of immigration restrictions and anti-globohomo.
If an empire exists, it isn't an American empire, it is a globalist empire centered on the global liberal media establishment, which itself is influenced by mega-elites like George Soros, and in turn influences left wing politicians like Biden, Trudeau, etc.
You've been calling them that because Putin has been feeding this same propaganda to people like you for a long time now. He's just saying it more openly now.
I didn't even follow any Russian sources until this war, and I have never seen them use any of those words. In fact, I've never seen anyone call the pathetic European apanages either vassals or slaves until this by Putin.
I'm not like you with your gullible Havana Syndrome or "Nord Stream 2 blew itself up" ass.
What exactly does "serving their own people" look like to you, in terms of policy? Is it just being anti-immigration and anti-globohomo and against free trade, or what?
Free trade is not damaging Europe. I'm for it. As you say, and some other things. Actually helping poor Europeans rather than throwing away money on phony refugees and 'climate'. And no absurd sanctions to benefit the Empire.
Because pretty much everyone on the Right is already in favor of immigration restrictions and anti-globohomo.
"The right" is a pathetic joke. What have you conserved? I don't blame you for this. And "the right" may be better than the alternative. But god damnit, if I didn't know their true purpose is to get into office, I'd call them monumental, astonishing, staggering, miserable failures.
If an empire exists, it isn't an American empire, it is a globalist empire centered on the global liberal media establishment, which itself is influenced by mega-elites like George Soros, and in turn influences left wing politicians like Biden, Trudeau, etc.
Yes, the propaganda apparatus is amazing. It even manages to persuade you of some blatant and obvious falsehoods.
I didn't even follow any Russian sources until this war
Russians primarily spread their propaganda internationally through sources that don't identify themselves as russian propaganda.
In fact, I've never seen anyone call the pathetic European apanages either vassals or slaves until this by Putin.
I think pro-russian and anti-american types on twitter say shit like that all the time. Example 1, Example 2. That's just me googling twitter america vassals and looking at the top couple results.
I'm not like you with your gullible Havana Syndrome
Havana Syndrome is a genuine issue of microwave radiation causing brain damage to a couple dozen people at US Embassies. They were medically examined and everything.
or "Nord Stream 2 blew itself up" ass.
Of course it didn't blow itself up. Russians blew it up on the orders of Putin for the reasons I explained: (1) Putin wants to use it in propganda, as here, and (2) Putin wants to burn his ships to undermine domestic dissent.
Actually helping poor Europeans
They should get a job and not rely on a socialist welfare state to coddle them.
rather than throwing away money on phony refugees and 'climate'.
I agree that refugees are a drain who would be booted, and "climate change" is a total scam. Bring on the heat. We might get a whole half degree hotter within our lifespans.
"The right" is a pathetic joke.
You're a member of the right so, okay.
What have you conserved?
The Right in the US has done a great deal to make America far less libtarded than Europe. It could always be better, but that's an ongoing battle.
But god damnit, if I didn't know their true purpose is to get into office, I'd call them monumental, astonishing, staggering, miserable failures.
The purpose of a political faction is a democracy is to win elections. You have to make due with the voters you're dealt. It's not the right's fault that the voters - mostly women - have been obsessed with faggots and trannies, and are easily manipulated by marxist propagandists. The Left is better than the Right at manipulation because the Left has been all-in on doing it for over 100 years now, so they've got a lot more practice and experience.
Yes, the propaganda apparatus is amazing. It even manages to persuade you of some blatant and obvious falsehoods.
I follow the truth wherever it leads. I don't have significant biases. Your bias against the United States and in favor of socialism undermine your ability to think clearly on a lot of topics.
Russians primarily spread their propaganda internationally through sources that don't identify themselves as russian propaganda.
No kidding. Like the NYT doesn't identify itself as "American propaganda". But by that standard, I follow only American propaganda, no Russian propaganda at all - though I'm appropriately skepticla of their nonsense.
I think pro-russian and anti-american types on twitter say shit like that all the time. Example 1, Example 2. That's just me googling twitter america vassals and looking at the top couple results.
It's an Indian and a Muslim. I've never heard anyone call European countries that. And most people here would be very offended, because they falsely imagine that we have independence and sovereignty.
Havana Syndrome is a genuine issue of microwave radiation causing brain damage to a couple dozen people at US Embassies. They were medically examined and everything.
No medical examination could prove the link.
Of course it didn't blow itself up. Russians blew it up on the orders of Putin for the reasons I explained: (1) Putin wants to use it in propganda, as here, and (2) Putin wants to burn his ships to undermine domestic dissent.
You're insane. Russia wanted Germany to lift sanctions, in order to prevent the devastation that will follow this winter. Now how are they going to do that?
They should get a job and not rely on a socialist welfare state to coddle them.
People with a job can't afford heating their homes. Thanks to your empire and our craven politicians who follow everything you say.
I agree that refugees are a drain who would be booted, and "climate change" is a total scam. Bring on the heat. We might get a whole half degree hotter within our lifespans.
A bit more than that probably, especially if you talk Fahrenheit. But they destroy our economies and our lives, take away our freedom, for something that makes .000000003 degrees difference.
You're a member of the right so, okay.
I am? You keep calling me a socialist and a Russian agent.
The Right in the US has done a great deal to make America far less libtarded than Europe. It could always be better, but that's an ongoing battle.
You've done not a thing that wasn't reflected in different starting conditions. Besides, in some ways America is more libtarded. My city isn't getting torched by BLM, and no one here would tolerate that, at least right now. A few more years of GAE/rainbow indoctrination might change that, but then we're still N years behind you in libtardation.
The purpose of a political faction is a democracy is to win elections.
Are you still on that 'democracy' beat as if it actually exists?
You have to make due with the voters you're dealt. It's not the right's fault that the voters - mostly women - have been obsessed with faggots and trannies, and are easily manipulated by marxist propagandists.
Nope. No one here is obsessed with faggots and trannies. Just the politicians. As you can see here.
It is the politicians who are like that. They're more right-wing economically than the average voters, and way more socially liberal. This is not a voter problem. This is a system problem. The system does not reflect the voters, and it was never intended to. It reflects the preferences of MNOs, billionaires and NGOs.
If the Conservatives wanted to reflect the population, they'd be more left on economic policies and way more right on social policy. But they don't, because there's no such thing as a democracy in Europe.
I follow the truth wherever it leads. I don't have significant biases. Your bias against the United States and in favor of socialism undermine your ability to think clearly on a lot of topics.
What socialism? Do you know what it even is? I'm also not biased against the US. Say of 100 people I encounter, maybe 1 or 2 are less negative about the US than I am.
You've been calling them that because Putin has been feeding this same propaganda to people like you for a long time now. He's just saying it more openly now.
What exactly does "serving their own people" look like to you, in terms of policy? Is it just being anti-immigration and anti-globohomo and against free trade, or what? Because pretty much everyone on the Right is already in favor of immigration restrictions and anti-globohomo.
If an empire exists, it isn't an American empire, it is a globalist empire centered on the global liberal media establishment, which itself is influenced by mega-elites like George Soros, and in turn influences left wing politicians like Biden, Trudeau, etc.
I didn't even follow any Russian sources until this war, and I have never seen them use any of those words. In fact, I've never seen anyone call the pathetic European apanages either vassals or slaves until this by Putin.
I'm not like you with your gullible Havana Syndrome or "Nord Stream 2 blew itself up" ass.
Free trade is not damaging Europe. I'm for it. As you say, and some other things. Actually helping poor Europeans rather than throwing away money on phony refugees and 'climate'. And no absurd sanctions to benefit the Empire.
"The right" is a pathetic joke. What have you conserved? I don't blame you for this. And "the right" may be better than the alternative. But god damnit, if I didn't know their true purpose is to get into office, I'd call them monumental, astonishing, staggering, miserable failures.
Yes, the propaganda apparatus is amazing. It even manages to persuade you of some blatant and obvious falsehoods.
Russians primarily spread their propaganda internationally through sources that don't identify themselves as russian propaganda.
I think pro-russian and anti-american types on twitter say shit like that all the time. Example 1, Example 2. That's just me googling twitter america vassals and looking at the top couple results.
Havana Syndrome is a genuine issue of microwave radiation causing brain damage to a couple dozen people at US Embassies. They were medically examined and everything.
Of course it didn't blow itself up. Russians blew it up on the orders of Putin for the reasons I explained: (1) Putin wants to use it in propganda, as here, and (2) Putin wants to burn his ships to undermine domestic dissent.
They should get a job and not rely on a socialist welfare state to coddle them.
I agree that refugees are a drain who would be booted, and "climate change" is a total scam. Bring on the heat. We might get a whole half degree hotter within our lifespans.
You're a member of the right so, okay.
The Right in the US has done a great deal to make America far less libtarded than Europe. It could always be better, but that's an ongoing battle.
The purpose of a political faction is a democracy is to win elections. You have to make due with the voters you're dealt. It's not the right's fault that the voters - mostly women - have been obsessed with faggots and trannies, and are easily manipulated by marxist propagandists. The Left is better than the Right at manipulation because the Left has been all-in on doing it for over 100 years now, so they've got a lot more practice and experience.
I follow the truth wherever it leads. I don't have significant biases. Your bias against the United States and in favor of socialism undermine your ability to think clearly on a lot of topics.
No kidding. Like the NYT doesn't identify itself as "American propaganda". But by that standard, I follow only American propaganda, no Russian propaganda at all - though I'm appropriately skepticla of their nonsense.
It's an Indian and a Muslim. I've never heard anyone call European countries that. And most people here would be very offended, because they falsely imagine that we have independence and sovereignty.
No medical examination could prove the link.
You're insane. Russia wanted Germany to lift sanctions, in order to prevent the devastation that will follow this winter. Now how are they going to do that?
People with a job can't afford heating their homes. Thanks to your empire and our craven politicians who follow everything you say.
A bit more than that probably, especially if you talk Fahrenheit. But they destroy our economies and our lives, take away our freedom, for something that makes .000000003 degrees difference.
I am? You keep calling me a socialist and a Russian agent.
You've done not a thing that wasn't reflected in different starting conditions. Besides, in some ways America is more libtarded. My city isn't getting torched by BLM, and no one here would tolerate that, at least right now. A few more years of GAE/rainbow indoctrination might change that, but then we're still N years behind you in libtardation.
Are you still on that 'democracy' beat as if it actually exists?
Nope. No one here is obsessed with faggots and trannies. Just the politicians. As you can see here.
https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd6c748xw2pzm8.cloudfront.net%2Fprod%2Fb4957020-4005-11ed-9814-cf2a1cdb824a-standard.png?dpr=1&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&source=next&width=700
It is the politicians who are like that. They're more right-wing economically than the average voters, and way more socially liberal. This is not a voter problem. This is a system problem. The system does not reflect the voters, and it was never intended to. It reflects the preferences of MNOs, billionaires and NGOs.
If the Conservatives wanted to reflect the population, they'd be more left on economic policies and way more right on social policy. But they don't, because there's no such thing as a democracy in Europe.
What socialism? Do you know what it even is? I'm also not biased against the US. Say of 100 people I encounter, maybe 1 or 2 are less negative about the US than I am.