Pointing out the obvious, the essay observes there is a "growing distance between the American people and the American media. This divergence [. . .] is reaching catastrophic levels, and at some point, the American people will figure out that the mainstream media do not like them and that they don’t much like the media’s understanding of the country."
Ya think?
I don't know what to make of this apparent non-sequitur: "Unfortunately, dominant media organizations have bonded with another large segment of the public—one that embraces its new approach. Pulling back from anti-Trump activism could prove commercially harmful.”
I wonder why the article pussyfoots around the major issue: corporate media has gone full retard because of Trump--their failed predictions of his defeat in '16 made their obsessive hate for him permanent, and they want to keep the ratings they inflated by constantly and obsessively ragging on the guy.
Pointing out the obvious, the essay observes there is a "growing distance between the American people and the American media. This divergence [. . .] is reaching catastrophic levels, and at some point, the American people will figure out that the mainstream media do not like them and that they don’t much like the media’s understanding of the country."
Ya think?
I don't know what to make of this apparent non-sequitur: "Unfortunately, dominant media organizations have bonded with another large segment of the public—one that embraces its new approach. Pulling back from anti-Trump activism could prove commercially harmful.”
I wonder why the article pussyfoots around the major issue: corporate media has gone full retard because of Trump--their failed predictions of his defeat in '16 made their obsessive hate for him permanent, and they want to keep the ratings they inflated by constantly and obsessively ragging on the guy.