I'm personally confused as to why they didn't outright ban him if they claim his abuse is so severe. They did the same with that sterling fellow a while back, and if the claims are to be believed what this guy did were a thousand times worse. To me this is them going after him, realizing they have no evidence to actually prove it, then backpedalling hoping noone will notice.
I'm personally confused as to why they didn't outright ban him if they claim his abuse is so severe. They did the same with that sterling fellow a while back, and if the claims are to be believed what this guy did were a thousand times worse. To me this is them going after him, realizing they have no evidence to actually prove it, then backpedalling hoping noone will notice.