Funny enough, Queen Elizabeth II may be one of the few people in her family that I suspect WASN'T a globalist conspirator. But that is just my opinion and I'm willing to listen to evidence saying otherwise.
Either way, to my knowledge, the head monarch doesn't really have power like a Prime Minister. There some technical powers that the head monarch has, but I suspect if the head monarch used those powers to interfer with govermnet policy, the Paraliment would most likely dissolve the monarchy.
The monarchy not engaging in politics isn't just a way to endear themselves to the public, it is also a way to make sure their gravy train of tax payer money & fame doesn't come to an end.
Perhaps she herself wasn't a globalist scumbag. She presided over a nation that was taken over by said globalist scumbags however. Britain is immeasurably worse off than before her rule as sovereign. Especially with regards to defending the British culture and people. Their nation is overrun with barbarian foreigners in such numbers that they'll likely never bounce back.
So even if she isn't one, then she's a failure as a ruler instead. Either way, the results are the same. I care about the what, far more than the why.
Funny enough, Queen Elizabeth II may be one of the few people in her family that I suspect WASN'T a globalist conspirator. But that is just my opinion and I'm willing to listen to evidence saying otherwise.
Either way, to my knowledge, the head monarch doesn't really have power like a Prime Minister. There some technical powers that the head monarch has, but I suspect if the head monarch used those powers to interfer with govermnet policy, the Paraliment would most likely dissolve the monarchy.
The monarchy not engaging in politics isn't just a way to endear themselves to the public, it is also a way to make sure their gravy train of tax payer money & fame doesn't come to an end.
Perhaps she herself wasn't a globalist scumbag. She presided over a nation that was taken over by said globalist scumbags however. Britain is immeasurably worse off than before her rule as sovereign. Especially with regards to defending the British culture and people. Their nation is overrun with barbarian foreigners in such numbers that they'll likely never bounce back.
So even if she isn't one, then she's a failure as a ruler instead. Either way, the results are the same. I care about the what, far more than the why.
She literally had a Rothschild as a financial adviser. It would be hard to see her as not being a globalist scumbag .