According to the figure you posted, and then only looked at the graphs (...)
Male unemployment in Jan 2020 was 4.2%. In December 5.4%, so an increase of 1.2 % points.
Female was 3.7%, in December 4.9%, so an increase in 1.2%.
So there is no evidence at all that women were 'fired last'.
As usual, your dumb ass provides the very evidence to disprove you, as you did with your claims that masses of evil womenz have abortions because it's determined that they're carrying boys.
The figures seem to show it. We'll know for sure when the economy completely crashes.
According to the figure you posted, and then only looked at the graphs (...)
Male unemployment in Jan 2020 was 4.2%. In December 5.4%, so an increase of 1.2 % points.
Female was 3.7%, in December 4.9%, so an increase in 1.2%.
So there is no evidence at all that women were 'fired last'.
As usual, your dumb ass provides the very evidence to disprove you, as you did with your claims that masses of evil womenz have abortions because it's determined that they're carrying boys.
Why did you pick January 2020? It's a very arbitrary point, considering most of those jobs were instantly destroyed.
Jesus Christ, I compared before corona to the highpoint of the firings resulting from it, dumbass.
So you're saying that the jobs 'deliberately destroyed' targeted women as much as men? How curious. The MORE FEMININE WAY works in mysterious ways!
But you know that the hospitality industry, which employed a lot of women, was hard hit. It's a disingenuous claim.
Great, now show me those 'figures' that prove these specific points.
I just did. The figures move together, but always affect women less.