better? lower crime rates at least, if you remove 13% of the population you instantly remove over half the crimes. small numbers of people committing crimes? so what, only small numbers of Muslims are terrorists, should we welcome them with open arms? blacks over represent in crime stats by 3 to 4 times their population every where they are, regardless of whether the country had historical black slavery or democrat policies or soviet communism or any other muh socioeconomic factors. Japan accepted less than 20 "refugees" and within days two of them were arrested for rape. 1930s? they had moderate success because they knew they had to follow white cultural norms and laws because the whites were not going to tolerate their shits if they stepped out the line and act like uncivilized apes.
there's no rational reason to keep a population that is consistently being net drain on society and commit most of the crimes at the same time, especially when it's 3 to 4 times the rates compared to the other populations. "you might be excluded based on your own arbitrary criteria" is fucking nonsense.
I don't care. I have had enough of the apes and the problems they caused. I don't want to see them, hear them, live near them. I won't hate them if I don't have to live with them and pay for them, they can go be whatever contributors or none contributors where they belong. Africa.
Oh well, I give up. It's clear you have a one-track mind. This exchange has been a good example of how this type of thinking is irrational, so you're more or less making my point anyways.
better? lower crime rates at least, if you remove 13% of the population you instantly remove over half the crimes. small numbers of people committing crimes? so what, only small numbers of Muslims are terrorists, should we welcome them with open arms? blacks over represent in crime stats by 3 to 4 times their population every where they are, regardless of whether the country had historical black slavery or democrat policies or soviet communism or any other muh socioeconomic factors. Japan accepted less than 20 "refugees" and within days two of them were arrested for rape. 1930s? they had moderate success because they knew they had to follow white cultural norms and laws because the whites were not going to tolerate their shits if they stepped out the line and act like uncivilized apes.
there's no rational reason to keep a population that is consistently being net drain on society and commit most of the crimes at the same time, especially when it's 3 to 4 times the rates compared to the other populations. "you might be excluded based on your own arbitrary criteria" is fucking nonsense.
I don't care. I have had enough of the apes and the problems they caused. I don't want to see them, hear them, live near them. I won't hate them if I don't have to live with them and pay for them, they can go be whatever contributors or none contributors where they belong. Africa.
You're still not answering any of my questions.
Oh well, I give up. It's clear you have a one-track mind. This exchange has been a good example of how this type of thinking is irrational, so you're more or less making my point anyways.