A weak one, but hey you are the one who continues to be so bad at arguments you tried "not one single time" and forgot to check if you actually had.
If you think being accused of being "butthurt" is an insult, then you have pretty thin skin.
Don't worry, no one is reading this gay shit anymore. Its just us homie.
Of course nobody else is reading it now. "Posterity" means people in the future.
You have a point though. This entire conversation with you has been pointless and a waste of time; I doubt it would keep anyone's interest long enough to read the full thing.
It didn't look bad, it simply ceased to make sense.
If something doesn't make sense, wouldn't you say that looks bad?
Its pretty faggy to say "the upvotes speak for themselves" about how bad it looks
I never said that. Again, reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit.
You said nothing to respond to, other than flinging freshman level debate club terms.
Big words are difficult for you? I literally spelled it out in my last comment and you still don't get it?
Actually, I think you do get it. You literally repeated the same points after both versions of my comment, so it's clear you understood what I was saying, you're just not a good faith actor. You have no intention of engaging in honest argumentation.
Of course when I do bring forth my argument, you immediately pull out your debate club handbook, call it bad faith and then get pissy when I insult you back.
I don't even recall you insulting me.
Your argument (if you can call it that) makes no sense. At no point did I say anything that would suggest I think race is a social construct, and you repeated that accusation TWICE... literally the same argument after the original version of my comment AND the edited version. And in neither case did it make sense.
If you think being accused of being "butthurt" is an insult, then you have pretty thin skin.
Irrelevant. You claimed you I couldn't name a time you did, and so I named it. That's why words are important my negro, because even if its weak and more amusing than insult you still did and then tried to claim you didn't. You'd think in that freshman debate club you'd learn about how little missteps like that do a lot to unravel arguments.
If something doesn't make sense, wouldn't you say that looks bad?
Not necessarily. The edit removed the context in which it was responding to, thereby people could not discern what it meant. But knowing it was editted makes it clear that context is missing, and any reader can know to withhold judgement on quality.
I never said that. Again, reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit
You probably shouldn't attack someone's reading comprehension when you fail to read a sentence properly. Because its me saying that gay phrase to you, not quoting you.
Big words are difficult for you?
Nah, I know the words. I'm just calling you out for thinking just saying logical fallacies count as an argument, and are an I Win card like a guy straight out of Tumblr Training School.
If you think being accused of being "butthurt" is an insult, then you have pretty thin skin.
Of course nobody else is reading it now. "Posterity" means people in the future.
You have a point though. This entire conversation with you has been pointless and a waste of time; I doubt it would keep anyone's interest long enough to read the full thing.
If something doesn't make sense, wouldn't you say that looks bad?
I never said that. Again, reading comprehension doesn't seem to be your strong suit.
Big words are difficult for you? I literally spelled it out in my last comment and you still don't get it?
Actually, I think you do get it. You literally repeated the same points after both versions of my comment, so it's clear you understood what I was saying, you're just not a good faith actor. You have no intention of engaging in honest argumentation.
I don't even recall you insulting me.
Your argument (if you can call it that) makes no sense. At no point did I say anything that would suggest I think race is a social construct, and you repeated that accusation TWICE... literally the same argument after the original version of my comment AND the edited version. And in neither case did it make sense.
Irrelevant. You claimed you I couldn't name a time you did, and so I named it. That's why words are important my negro, because even if its weak and more amusing than insult you still did and then tried to claim you didn't. You'd think in that freshman debate club you'd learn about how little missteps like that do a lot to unravel arguments.
Not necessarily. The edit removed the context in which it was responding to, thereby people could not discern what it meant. But knowing it was editted makes it clear that context is missing, and any reader can know to withhold judgement on quality.
You probably shouldn't attack someone's reading comprehension when you fail to read a sentence properly. Because its me saying that gay phrase to you, not quoting you.
Nah, I know the words. I'm just calling you out for thinking just saying logical fallacies count as an argument, and are an I Win card like a guy straight out of Tumblr Training School.