Yes, because if you don’t believe the Jews are all conspiring together to control western society then you obviously must believe race is a social construct.
I said nothing of the sort. I simply called your argument incredibly stupid because it took one idea and just 180'd it so hard that it became retarded in the opposite direction.
Probably why you editted it to something completely different and far more vague. Now you can't be called out because you aren't saying anything anymore.
You accused me of believing race is a social construct. You made up a straw man based on a false dichotomy and I called you out on it. Plain and simple.
I still don’t even know what you’re arguing against. You’re just butthurt in general it seems. You’ve said nothing of substance except to attack me.
This is the original comment that was up for a little more than a minute:
The math isn’t the problem. The problem is the idiotic belief that because Jews share genetic heritage that they’re all the same, believe the same things, have the same values, are friendly with one another, and/or are all collaborating and plotting with one another to take over the world or something.
Here’s the current, edited comment that you claim is “completely different”:
The math is neither wrong, nor a problem. What wrong is the belief underlying the implication being made.
There. Now you don’t have any excuses. Now explain how your response wasn’t a complete straw-man and false dichotomy? What exactly did I say that you disagree with?
Yes, because if you don’t believe the Jews are all conspiring together to control western society then you obviously must believe race is a social construct.
I said nothing of the sort. I simply called your argument incredibly stupid because it took one idea and just 180'd it so hard that it became retarded in the opposite direction.
Probably why you editted it to something completely different and far more vague. Now you can't be called out because you aren't saying anything anymore.
You accused me of believing race is a social construct. You made up a straw man based on a false dichotomy and I called you out on it. Plain and simple.
Right, because you were so cowardly you editted the comment after I wrote that so now what I wrote does look pretty wild.
Any smug response you try fails because of that pathetic little move.
You’re just making excuses and deflecting.
I still don’t even know what you’re arguing against. You’re just butthurt in general it seems. You’ve said nothing of substance except to attack me.
This is the original comment that was up for a little more than a minute:
Here’s the current, edited comment that you claim is “completely different”:
There. Now you don’t have any excuses. Now explain how your response wasn’t a complete straw-man and false dichotomy? What exactly did I say that you disagree with?