The problem with lynching was when it was like "oh he whistled at a white woman", now it's part of the black victim narrative and we have to hear about it forever.
I wouldn't doubt that was a lie. Having seen the obvious bullshit they spew today, we need to question everything we've been told by the media.
One of the side effects of constantly being lied to by the media is that I no longer trust anything the media has ever said stretching back to the beginning of recorded history. I have no reason to believe that the ubiquity of sociopathy among journalists is strictly a modern trend.
I am of the opinion Emmitt Till probably did say some shit and huwhites overreacted but Jesus tapdancing Christ it was a single incident like 70 years ago.
Do you know how many fucked up less-than isolated incidents we could associate with blacks forever?
Also: amplifying ultimately insignificant historical incidents and applying them as commonplace representations of history is a terrible postmodern tactic to distort history at will for whoever holds the lens.
I am of the opinion Emmitt Till probably did say some shit and huwhites overreacted but Jesus tapdancing Christ it was a single incident like 70 years ago.
The fact that the best example they have was 70 years ago is stupid enough on its own, but I really have to question if they're reporting truthfully on it. I would not be the slightest bit surprised if he went further than what they claim. How much further, I don't know, but I do not trust them to not lie and exaggerate at every opportunity.
Do you know how many fucked up less-than isolated incidents we could associate with blacks forever?
There are even more recent ones that the media chose to memory hole. Like the group of blacks that kidnapped a retard and took a video of them saying things like "fuck white people" or the black guy that shot a white kid. There's no doubt more, but I really need to work harder on bookmarking these kinds of stories so I don't forget all the details.
I wouldn't doubt that was a lie. Having seen the obvious bullshit they spew today, we need to question everything we've been told by the media.
One of the side effects of constantly being lied to by the media is that I no longer trust anything the media has ever said stretching back to the beginning of recorded history. I have no reason to believe that the ubiquity of sociopathy among journalists is strictly a modern trend.
I am of the opinion Emmitt Till probably did say some shit and huwhites overreacted but Jesus tapdancing Christ it was a single incident like 70 years ago.
Do you know how many fucked up less-than isolated incidents we could associate with blacks forever?
Also: amplifying ultimately insignificant historical incidents and applying them as commonplace representations of history is a terrible postmodern tactic to distort history at will for whoever holds the lens.
The fact that the best example they have was 70 years ago is stupid enough on its own, but I really have to question if they're reporting truthfully on it. I would not be the slightest bit surprised if he went further than what they claim. How much further, I don't know, but I do not trust them to not lie and exaggerate at every opportunity.
There are even more recent ones that the media chose to memory hole. Like the group of blacks that kidnapped a retard and took a video of them saying things like "fuck white people" or the black guy that shot a white kid. There's no doubt more, but I really need to work harder on bookmarking these kinds of stories so I don't forget all the details.