You see, incest produces disabled and deformed offspring at a higher than otherwise rate, so you being against incest means you’re supporting the idea that there should be fewer disabled people in the world, which is “latent eugenics.”
"Good news, everyone! I have just discovered a panacea that cures all cancers!"
"Why do you hate cancer sufferers? Why do you want to eradicate them from the world? Are you a Nazi?"
This is what you get when you care more about identity groups than the people that constitute them. The extinction of the "disabled people" class is only a negative if it is accomplished by converting the disabled into the deceased; if it is accomplished by preventing people from becoming disabled in the first place, that's a purely good outcome.
Advocacy groups for Autism and Deafness are already doing that. They don't want to cure those disorders, they'd rather people who are autistic (neuroatypical) or deaf embrace that as part of their identity and get special privileges.
"Good news, everyone! I have just discovered a panacea that cures all cancers!"
"Why do you hate cancer sufferers? Why do you want to eradicate them from the world? Are you a Nazi?"
This is what you get when you care more about identity groups than the people that constitute them. The extinction of the "disabled people" class is only a negative if it is accomplished by converting the disabled into the deceased; if it is accomplished by preventing people from becoming disabled in the first place, that's a purely good outcome.
Advocacy groups for Autism and Deafness are already doing that. They don't want to cure those disorders, they'd rather people who are autistic (neuroatypical) or deaf embrace that as part of their identity and get special privileges.
That is some well-explained neo-Marxist identitarian rationalizing.
It's fucking sick. it's like existing (can't call it living) in an anthill.