Don't dare comment on Jews though.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity attacks
Comment Approved: This hasn't crossed the line in being an identity attack. I don't know that it's even true, but it's no more racist than saying the majority of basketball teams are owned by whites, which is to say: not racist at all, and not an attack on an identity group.
Which, is why you weren't banned for saying that. You were banned for insinuating that it was a jewish conspiracy to make non-jews absorb porn and consumer goods to affect jewish world domination. That is a violation of Rule 16.
Disparate outcomes are not actually evidence of racial discrimination (or racial nepotism either).
Would a jew get banned for saying the same thing I did? Cause that's what the pornographers have gone on record saying.
If a jew advocated that jews use pornography as a weapon for racial and ethnic domination, it would absolutely be a violation of Rule 16. If they argued it for the sake of ethnic cleansing or genocide, it would be a violation of Rule 2.
If a jew simply said: jews are disproportionately represented in pornography, it wouldn't be a violation of Rule 16, because it does not allege any sort of racial conspiracy. Your not going to be treated differently than a jew, how would I know who a jew is online? I can't even tell what sex you are.
I'm not advocating for anything. I'm pointing out what Jewish pornographers have gone on record saying. Why was I banned? It's a fact.
You were banned because you were insinuating a jewish conspiracy to use porn as a weapon against the general population of the earth for jewish domination.
Interesting semi-related fact. Nearly half of all basketball teams have Jewish owners.
W/e, same difference.