No, they aren't because that's not how anything works. There is no realistic policy any would craft that allows Thomas and none of the shitty blacks. Regression to the mean is a thing.
We already see the outcome of white people embracing "colorblindedness" all around us, and they are terrible. I don't even see any room for debate here. They are objectively terrible. They've destroyed our cities, schools, culture, and politics. They've made it borderline impossible for us to advocate for our own future.
Your problem is that you are a liberal so to you, one of the worst things you can do is fail to treat someone as an individual. It's not "fair" to exclude the "based" minorities. There is a normally invisible hierarchy of values at work wherein jeopardizing white American's future is a worthy sacrifice in exchange for "fairness" or rather inclusiveness if we are being honest. But none of that stems from an object truth. It's not objectively better to be "inclusive." White people can choose our own future.
Why would I? I like it when countries keep immigrants out.
Israel only keeps gentile immigrants out. It seems to me you just like whatever Israel does, and you will find a way to hamster your way into saying it's good no matter how contradictory it is to your stated values.
You would have reason to complain if she were in a R+20 district. In fact, she's in a D+8 or something district. She's literally the best you're going to get.
Exactly. Her district is the most Hispanic one in Texas. This is what I'm talking about. Republicans aren't doomed by replacement immigration. They will just become more pozzed to win over the Nu Americans, exactly like they are doing here. Elections are a means, not an end. I don't care if pozzed R's win.
It means there will not be a grand anti-white alliance.
No, it means the anti-white alliance isn't invulnerable, but I already knew that.
Not really strange.
It kind of is. AA is way more popular than specifically AA in college admissions. I'm not sure why, but it is.
No, they aren't because that's not how anything works. There is no realistic policy any would craft that allows Thomas and none of the shitty blacks. Regression to the mean is a thing.
We already see the outcome of white people embracing "colorblindedness" all around us, and they are terrible. I don't even see any room for debate here. They are objectively terrible. They've destroyed our cities, schools, culture, and politics. They've made it borderline impossible for us to advocate for our own future.
Your problem is that you are a liberal so to you, one of the worst things you can do is fail to treat someone as an individual. It's not "fair" to exclude the "based" minorities. There is a normally invisible hierarchy of values at work wherein jeopardizing white American's future is a worthy sacrifice in exchange for "fairness" or rather inclusiveness if we are being honest. But none of that stems from an object truth. It's not objectively better to be "inclusive." White people can choose our own future.
Israel only keeps gentile immigrants out. It seems to me you just like whatever Israel does, and you will find a way to hamster your way into saying it's good no matter how contradictory it is to your stated values.
Exactly. Her district is the most Hispanic one in Texas. This is what I'm talking about. Republicans aren't doomed by replacement immigration. They will just become more pozzed to win over the Nu Americans, exactly like they are doing here. Elections are a means, not an end. I don't care if pozzed R's win.
No, it means the anti-white alliance isn't invulnerable, but I already knew that.
It kind of is. AA is way more popular than specifically AA in college admissions. I'm not sure why, but it is.