I didn't say that though. What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior and the only reason "Sarah" was being reported on was to further justify their violence.
I'm not sure if you understand UK court. You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty. The legal system there exists to enforce women's will and nothing else. It's funny that we're having this discussion on a conversation about Amber Heard, because the UK was the only place in the world that considered her accusations credible.
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
It's not mind reading, it's glaringly obvious. Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail. These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior
Mad as a March hare. By that standard, I won't care about men murdered by women, because men have been raping and murdering women for centuries. I guess our little Marc Lepine doesn't find that terribly persuasive.
You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty
Right, like the guy who was acquitted for slitting his wife's throat. Anyway, so the defense is making all sorts of other arguments, but not this great argument that you brilliantly discovered, because? They're bribed not to embarrass the court?
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
Because it wasn't graphic, visual porn, dummy.
Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail.
Like you are behind the man who murdered Sarah Everhard, the troon sex offender who exposed himself to children, and that Manchester United alleged rapist.
By the way, why should women care after you've spent centuries murdering and raping them? You have forfeited any right to whine about Amber Heard with what you said about Sarah Everhard, you little psycho.
These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
I didn't say that though. What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior and the only reason "Sarah" was being reported on was to further justify their violence.
I'm not sure if you understand UK court. You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty. The legal system there exists to enforce women's will and nothing else. It's funny that we're having this discussion on a conversation about Amber Heard, because the UK was the only place in the world that considered her accusations credible.
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
It's not mind reading, it's glaringly obvious. Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail. These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
Mad as a March hare. By that standard, I won't care about men murdered by women, because men have been raping and murdering women for centuries. I guess our little Marc Lepine doesn't find that terribly persuasive.
Right, like the guy who was acquitted for slitting his wife's throat. Anyway, so the defense is making all sorts of other arguments, but not this great argument that you brilliantly discovered, because? They're bribed not to embarrass the court?
Because it wasn't graphic, visual porn, dummy.
Like you are behind the man who murdered Sarah Everhard, the troon sex offender who exposed himself to children, and that Manchester United alleged rapist.
By the way, why should women care after you've spent centuries murdering and raping them? You have forfeited any right to whine about Amber Heard with what you said about Sarah Everhard, you little psycho.
More of your delusions. Reality says otherwise.