Your externalities at the bottom are sort of everything. I wouldn't trust Australia even a little to have realistic numbers about covid infection, at any point since early 2020. I think their insistence that they had close to zero transmission at any point naive fiction. There isn't anywhere on Earth that has numbers of "absence of covid infection," because it's an easily-endemic airborne cold virus. Anywhere that claims to have not had it is a combination of lying and putting on a best face.
To your other points: This is my Socratic point to previous poster, and why I pointed out that those in my own family affected are certainly not going into any database, VAERS or otherwise, that can be laid at the feet of the holy vaxx. There is (and never has been) any remotely reliable way to note mortality. In 2020 all customs and best practices and procedures were thrown out the window, largely thanks to the WHO and the CDC.
Mortality cause reporting has become a joke. Some number of people--possibly hundreds, possibly hundreds of thousands--are dying of everything but certainly not complications from the vaxx no sir no sirree. We started experiencing excess death from lockdown and mass hysteria in 2020 by way of suicide, homicide, and overdose, to the extent where looking for any specific cause of death increase in excess mortality is completely out the window.
MSM has absolutely no incentive and no interest in turning over rocks in pursuit of anything resembling the truth here. Almost every politico on Earth from dogcatcher to President is rightly afraid that widespread truth-telling may end with their heads on pikes.
Back to the point of the exercise. Hypothetically, and given the state of things, were it true that mass vaccination has caused widespread damage to peoples' immune systems, and as a result, long suppressed potential infectious pathogens were being given the opportunity to flourish again, resulting in unexpected, seemingly unrelated infections across the board--through what process would we know, beyond a handful of "crank" whistleblowers desperately trying to press through 18 tons of media flak and opposition to get the truth out?
Hold on--isn't that what we just went through with the dreaded coof itself?
Your externalities at the bottom are sort of everything. I wouldn't trust Australia even a little to have realistic numbers about covid infection, at any point since early 2020. I think their insistence that they had close to zero transmission at any point naive fiction. There isn't anywhere on Earth that has numbers of "absence of covid infection," because it's an easily-endemic airborne cold virus. Anywhere that claims to have not had it is a combination of lying and putting on a best face.
To your other points: This is my Socratic point to previous poster, and why I pointed out that those in my own family affected are certainly not going into any database, VAERS or otherwise, that can be laid at the feet of the holy vaxx. There is (and never has been) any remotely reliable way to note mortality. In 2020 all customs and best practices and procedures were thrown out the window, largely thanks to the WHO and the CDC.
Mortality cause reporting has become a joke. Some number of people--possibly hundreds, possibly hundreds of thousands--are dying of everything but certainly not complications from the vaxx no sir no sirree. We started experiencing excess death from lockdown and mass hysteria in 2020 by way of suicide, homicide, and overdose, to the extent where looking for any specific cause of death increase in excess mortality is completely out the window.
MSM has absolutely no incentive and no interest in turning over rocks in pursuit of anything resembling the truth here. Almost every politico on Earth from dogcatcher to President is rightly afraid that widespread truth-telling may end with their heads on pikes.
Back to the point of the exercise. Hypothetically, and given the state of things, were it true that mass vaccination has caused widespread damage to peoples' immune systems, and as a result, long suppressed potential infectious pathogens were being given the opportunity to flourish again, resulting in unexpected, seemingly unrelated infections across the board--through what process would we know, beyond a handful of "crank" whistleblowers desperately trying to press through 18 tons of media flak and opposition to get the truth out?
Hold on--isn't that what we just went through with the dreaded coof itself?