If you really wanted to protect the kids, and if they really wanted to, they would act as I stated, pushing for a constitutional amendment that removes gendered privilege from law, bans sex change surgeries and enshrines their precious single-sex bathrooms.
But they won't, because that will be a huge loss of decades of stolen money from male taxpayers. And that female privilege, to have perks unique to women, like government contracts to woman-led companies, like scholarships just for women, is why they really care.
They just wrap it all up in a cutesy "we care about kids" line, but their hatred for males can't even hide long enough to make that work, so now they're endlessly whining about mastectomies, even though they're the only part of the trans garbage that actually can be reversed.
If you really wanted to protect the kids, and if they really wanted to, they would act as I stated, pushing for a constitutional amendment that removes gendered privilege from law, bans sex change surgeries and enshrines their precious single-sex bathrooms.
I actually think most of them would support that. Hell, they would delusionally think that the non-bathroom stuff is to their benefit.
And that female privilege, to have perks unique to women, like government contracts to woman-led companies, like scholarships just for women, is why they really care.
Literally no one cares. It's the happy few who benefit from such things. If you were sincere about opposing this sort of thing, you'd oppose race-based scholarships.
They just wrap it all up in a cutesy "we care about kids" line
You keep forgetting that I don't care about their motives. Which, judging by their comments, is not primarily the kids, but their own safety and privacy.
line, but their hatred for males can't even hide long enough to make that work, so now they're endlessly whining about mastectomies, even though they're the only part of the trans garbage that actually can be reversed.
Don't be an idiot. You can never get your breasts back.
They wouldn't. That's why they haven't even thought about proposing it. Feminist-aligned politicians in most of Europe could have it done tomorrow if they voted together on it, but they want the solution to this problem to kick men even more while they're down.
Money talks and bullshit walks. They talk a lot of the latter to hide the former. Regarding race-based scholarships, can we take things one step at a time? I wouldn't want to throw away the one chance the world gets at defeating feminism by pushing unrelated things.
Even that isn't their true motive. Like I said, money talks. The idea of losing those scholarships, those organizations that only help women, the government support earmarked for women first...that's what scares them.
Angelina Jolie isn't flat chested, and she had a mastectomy for medical reasons. You absolutely can get them back, if you have enough $$$.
They wouldn't. That's why they haven't even thought about proposing it. Feminist-aligned politicians in most of Europe could have it done tomorrow if they voted together on it, but they want the solution to this problem to kick men even more while they're down.
They call it the 'Equal Rights Amendment', and they've tried to pass it for decades...
Money talks and bullshit walks. They talk a lot of the latter to hide the former. Regarding race-based scholarships, can we take things one step at a time? I wouldn't want to throw away the one chance the world gets at defeating feminism by pushing unrelated things.
It shows that you are not actually upset about unfair treatment. Race-based scholarships are far more common, as is discrimination against whites and Asians.
The idea of losing those scholarships, those organizations that only help women, the government support earmarked for women first...that's what scares them.
Those scholarships and 'support' no one cares about. The organizations they probably do care about.
Angelina Jolie isn't flat chested, and she had a mastectomy for medical reasons. You absolutely can get them back, if you have enough $$$.
If you've read that horrid thing, it actually is a defence of gender specific treatment and specifically speaks about women's complaints about the world, like the fake wage gap and other meme-worthy garbage.
I guess I'm more upset about unfair treatment when it benefits people who I don't like, already get too much special treatment to start with and are incredibly ungrateful for everything they get.
They care a lot about those scholarships and support. That's money in the bank and more feminist whiners making the world a worse place.
And? None of these people are going to have kids anyway, they're repulsive feminists, usually lesbian. What does it matter?
I hate this argument from you.
If you really wanted to protect the kids, and if they really wanted to, they would act as I stated, pushing for a constitutional amendment that removes gendered privilege from law, bans sex change surgeries and enshrines their precious single-sex bathrooms.
But they won't, because that will be a huge loss of decades of stolen money from male taxpayers. And that female privilege, to have perks unique to women, like government contracts to woman-led companies, like scholarships just for women, is why they really care.
They just wrap it all up in a cutesy "we care about kids" line, but their hatred for males can't even hide long enough to make that work, so now they're endlessly whining about mastectomies, even though they're the only part of the trans garbage that actually can be reversed.
I actually think most of them would support that. Hell, they would delusionally think that the non-bathroom stuff is to their benefit.
Literally no one cares. It's the happy few who benefit from such things. If you were sincere about opposing this sort of thing, you'd oppose race-based scholarships.
You keep forgetting that I don't care about their motives. Which, judging by their comments, is not primarily the kids, but their own safety and privacy.
Don't be an idiot. You can never get your breasts back.
They wouldn't. That's why they haven't even thought about proposing it. Feminist-aligned politicians in most of Europe could have it done tomorrow if they voted together on it, but they want the solution to this problem to kick men even more while they're down.
Money talks and bullshit walks. They talk a lot of the latter to hide the former. Regarding race-based scholarships, can we take things one step at a time? I wouldn't want to throw away the one chance the world gets at defeating feminism by pushing unrelated things.
Even that isn't their true motive. Like I said, money talks. The idea of losing those scholarships, those organizations that only help women, the government support earmarked for women first...that's what scares them.
Angelina Jolie isn't flat chested, and she had a mastectomy for medical reasons. You absolutely can get them back, if you have enough $$$.
They call it the 'Equal Rights Amendment', and they've tried to pass it for decades...
It shows that you are not actually upset about unfair treatment. Race-based scholarships are far more common, as is discrimination against whites and Asians.
Those scholarships and 'support' no one cares about. The organizations they probably do care about.
Christ. They're not real.
If you've read that horrid thing, it actually is a defence of gender specific treatment and specifically speaks about women's complaints about the world, like the fake wage gap and other meme-worthy garbage.
I guess I'm more upset about unfair treatment when it benefits people who I don't like, already get too much special treatment to start with and are incredibly ungrateful for everything they get.
They care a lot about those scholarships and support. That's money in the bank and more feminist whiners making the world a worse place.
And? None of these people are going to have kids anyway, they're repulsive feminists, usually lesbian. What does it matter?