Just for an example, Biden's early bill that gave loans to struggling businesses prioritized women at the top, then POC, then white men. A white man who identified as female could jump the queue and claim that money.
Funny thing is, they barely even talk about that. It's about the invasion of their personal space. Or is that too a conspiracy? They know not talk about it in public because then everyone following GC, which is the vast majority of the world, will be alerted to their privileges and work to abolish them!
Do any political movements openly talk about their end goal being protecting money given to their members?
These are people meeting themselves online. You claim it's about 'government loans', while their own behavior shows that you're as wrong here as you were when you said that 90% would die of the vaccine.
You mean like feminists talk about "Empowering domestic abuse victims" not "getting women off for obvious murder", even though the latter was closer to reality?
It's almost like feminists are liars who twist and turn the narrative to fit public perception, regardless of what the reality of their position is.
I bet you everything I have that none of those people have even met a transgender, that they just fear men claiming women's privilege, and frame it in a way that activates all the tradcuck white knights.
Women-only scholarships.
Women-only job quotas.
Women-only government contracts.
Women-only loans and investment opportunities.
Just for an example, Biden's early bill that gave loans to struggling businesses prioritized women at the top, then POC, then white men. A white man who identified as female could jump the queue and claim that money.
Funny thing is, they barely even talk about that. It's about the invasion of their personal space. Or is that too a conspiracy? They know not talk about it in public because then everyone following GC, which is the vast majority of the world, will be alerted to their privileges and work to abolish them!
Do any political movements openly talk about their end goal being protecting money given to their members?
Not exactly, it's just bad optics to talk about financial gain/loss due to a policy that isn't about money.
These are people meeting themselves online. You claim it's about 'government loans', while their own behavior shows that you're as wrong here as you were when you said that 90% would die of the vaccine.
You mean like feminists talk about "Empowering domestic abuse victims" not "getting women off for obvious murder", even though the latter was closer to reality?
It's almost like feminists are liars who twist and turn the narrative to fit public perception, regardless of what the reality of their position is.
I bet you everything I have that none of those people have even met a transgender, that they just fear men claiming women's privilege, and frame it in a way that activates all the tradcuck white knights.