Listen, no one is saying that wives can’t blow their husbands you imbecile. The presence of illegality is there to be used as a deterrent so that it’s not seen in public, or depicted in films, etc.
Less sexual degeneracy is good not only for the individual’s soul, but also the fate of the community in which the individual lives. Sodom wasn’t destroyed because a bunch of guys liked fucking each other behind closed doors, but because they insisted on forcing their degeneracy on others. These laws would limit that.
Sorry you’re defending degeneracy by saying stopping it is censorship, and your brain is too small to understand censorship is useful (and the founders not only agreed with me, they advocated for it as well).
Is not letting faggots fuck in public censorship? Is removal of the depictions of deviant sexual actions from media censorship? What about editing books aimed at children to remove references to faggotry, underaged sex etc?
You would agree that it is, because you see freedom as an end in and of itself. You feel that these things are art, or should be depicted, or at least someone should have the freedom to do these things. You don’t understand that sexual ethics echo out to the rest of society, and lead to an erosion of our central mores. Do you think what we see now has no connection to the sexual revolution? Do you think returning to a state befor that would be bad?
sorry, I didn't realize you were retarded
the guy who thinks we need to criminalize a wife sucking her husband's dick to stop drag queens is calling ME a retard. riiiiiiiiiiiight.
Listen, no one is saying that wives can’t blow their husbands you imbecile. The presence of illegality is there to be used as a deterrent so that it’s not seen in public, or depicted in films, etc.
Less sexual degeneracy is good not only for the individual’s soul, but also the fate of the community in which the individual lives. Sodom wasn’t destroyed because a bunch of guys liked fucking each other behind closed doors, but because they insisted on forcing their degeneracy on others. These laws would limit that.
Sorry you’re defending degeneracy by saying stopping it is censorship, and your brain is too small to understand censorship is useful (and the founders not only agreed with me, they advocated for it as well).
Is not letting faggots fuck in public censorship? Is removal of the depictions of deviant sexual actions from media censorship? What about editing books aimed at children to remove references to faggotry, underaged sex etc?
You would agree that it is, because you see freedom as an end in and of itself. You feel that these things are art, or should be depicted, or at least someone should have the freedom to do these things. You don’t understand that sexual ethics echo out to the rest of society, and lead to an erosion of our central mores. Do you think what we see now has no connection to the sexual revolution? Do you think returning to a state befor that would be bad?
you imbecile
No u