Like anyone would get an erection looking at them. And if it was really about protecting themselves from that, maybe they should admit why these people exist - because of their unhinged hatred for everything male.
The reason why people sometimes suspect that you are female, is because you spend an inordinate amount of time whining about inconsequential BS.
Whether or not people hate 'everything male' has no effect on my life, which is why you have to make up increasingly bizarre tales - like 90% dying because of the vaccine "created by women to kill men".
I remember those memes people made about the weird Handmaid's Tale fantasies the baby murderers have.
What is wrong with abortion if the baby is a member of the Oppressor Gender?
Why is everything with women about sex?
It's troons themselves who brag about getting erections when they enter female spaces, because it makes them feel 'validated' - actually, satisfies their fetish.
When you're talking about people who mutilate themselves to be part of the female in-group, the actions of said in-group towards the out-group are very relevant.
They do it for their sexual fetish.
Myocarditis is now reportedly 1 in 5000. It has been constantly becoming more common over the last few months.
OK, so there's myocarditis in 0.02%. How many of them died? Are we reaching the 90% you predicted any time now?
Honesty is a detriment to the goal of female supremacy.
Say, didn't you promise to admit that you were wrong if your predictions about Kim Potter not being charged, her name not being released and her picture not being shown, and then immediately turn around and make several more laughable predictions when you were proven wrong the very same day?
Do you have any proof other than carefully curated garbage pushed by people with a vested interest in that being the case?
That is rich, now you want proof? How is it that you only want proof when it's a view that you do not like. When you do, there's no evidence because they destroyed it all, or because the womans blackmailed and bribed everyone to deny it.
I was overly pessimistic, but the logic was correct.
90% vs. < 0.02%... "the logic was correct".
Was I wrong though?
Well, you were only wrong 6 times. Or as it's known by your standards: the usual. And the best part is that every time your predictions came out false, you did not introspection, but instead make a new laughably stupid prediction that also turned out FALSE.
And now you deny you were wrong at all!
I bet if a male cop shot a woman to death "by accident", he'd get a lot more than that.
I bet that even if that were to happen, and he was acquitted or not even charged, you'd claim that Carrie Symonds and Melinda persuaded the prosecutors not to charge him to persuade US that THEEEY mean well, and that we should trust THEEEEM.
Leaving aside your usual crazy, you kept insisting that "they don't throw their own under the bus" (despite Rotherham), and that she would not be punished "because she is a woman". I pointed out to you the case of Mehrsele, but you obviously ignored that. By the way, he got about the same sentence, even though what he did was worse.
The reason why people sometimes suspect that you are female, is because you spend an inordinate amount of time whining about inconsequential BS.
Whether or not people hate 'everything male' has no effect on my life, which is why you have to make up increasingly bizarre tales - like 90% dying because of the vaccine "created by women to kill men".
What is wrong with abortion if the baby is a member of the Oppressor Gender?
It's troons themselves who brag about getting erections when they enter female spaces, because it makes them feel 'validated' - actually, satisfies their fetish.
They do it for their sexual fetish.
OK, so there's myocarditis in 0.02%. How many of them died? Are we reaching the 90% you predicted any time now?
Say, didn't you promise to admit that you were wrong if your predictions about Kim Potter not being charged, her name not being released and her picture not being shown, and then immediately turn around and make several more laughable predictions when you were proven wrong the very same day?
That is rich, now you want proof? How is it that you only want proof when it's a view that you do not like. When you do, there's no evidence because they destroyed it all, or because the womans blackmailed and bribed everyone to deny it.
90% vs. < 0.02%... "the logic was correct".
Well, you were only wrong 6 times. Or as it's known by your standards: the usual. And the best part is that every time your predictions came out false, you did not introspection, but instead make a new laughably stupid prediction that also turned out FALSE.
And now you deny you were wrong at all!
I bet that even if that were to happen, and he was acquitted or not even charged, you'd claim that Carrie Symonds and Melinda persuaded the prosecutors not to charge him to persuade US that THEEEY mean well, and that we should trust THEEEEM.
Leaving aside your usual crazy, you kept insisting that "they don't throw their own under the bus" (despite Rotherham), and that she would not be punished "because she is a woman". I pointed out to you the case of Mehrsele, but you obviously ignored that. By the way, he got about the same sentence, even though what he did was worse.