You need to prove it was stolen. I don't need to prove it was not stolen. The burden of proof is on the people claiming it was stolen. It's not guilty until proven innocent. The default state of US elections is not "stolen"
No, you need to prove it wasn't stolen. If Alex Jones wins 2024 with write-ins you wouldn't say "well we can't prove he didn't win legitimately". That's an absurd standard that you only have because you can't prove it wasn't stolen - not even at a preponderance of evidence standard.
This is the most fundamental requirement for an election is that everybody agrees it was fairly conducted; this is the source of all the democratic government's legitimacy.
And in your response we see that you have zero actual evidence it wasn't stolen other than blind trust - after saying you must base your decisions on facts only.
No, you need to prove it wasn't stolen. If Alex Jones wins 2024 with write-ins you wouldn't say "well we can't prove he didn't win legitimately". That's an absurd standard that you only have because you can't prove it wasn't stolen - not even at a preponderance of evidence standard.
This is the most fundamental requirement for an election is that everybody agrees it was fairly conducted; this is the source of all the democratic government's legitimacy.
And in your response we see that you have zero actual evidence it wasn't stolen other than blind trust - after saying you must base your decisions on facts only.