Yeah, you didn't see headlines like this coming out of these filthy rags when the Obergefell v. Hodges decision dropped, even though freakin' California had voted against gay marriage when it was put on the ballot.
Twice. The first initiative was overturned by activist judges. The second one had one of the state Supreme Court justices attempting to declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional (under the state constitution). That guy was later vetted by Obama for the Supreme Court.
Does Politico deliberately publish idiotic, politically ignorant tripe? The assumption that the SC should bend to "public opinion" is retarded.
They're not that consistent.
They think the SC should go against public opinion when public opinion is against them, and in favor of public opinion when it's in their favor.
Yeah, you didn't see headlines like this coming out of these filthy rags when the Obergefell v. Hodges decision dropped, even though freakin' California had voted against gay marriage when it was put on the ballot.
Twice. The first initiative was overturned by activist judges. The second one had one of the state Supreme Court justices attempting to declare a constitutional amendment unconstitutional (under the state constitution). That guy was later vetted by Obama for the Supreme Court.