It’s statistically more likely Rubinsteins ancestors owned more slaves than Madison. Then again we can talk about the overwhelmingly large amount of Jewish slave owners in America and globally? I think it’s time we force every minority to experience the cruelties their ancestors committed and then ask if they want to be white.
Rather, it's more likely that they were involved in the slave trade rather than in slave owning per se, the most cruel part of the slavery system. Middlemen everywhere engaged in trade in humans as though it was like trade in goods.
The mistake is to say that there was anything wrong in slavery at the time. It was simply what existed at the time. The people who judge people in the past for holding slaves are the same kind of people who insist that they would have been the exceptional anti-Nazi rebel - when in fact, their obedience to the norms of the CurrentYear demonstrates that back then, they would have obeyed the norms of the time.
It's also very funny some of these users claiming Jews owned slaves and act as if they are against it when these people have complete and utter disdain against black people. They would be slave owners if they could back then. In fact, if they could get away with it, these neonazis would own black slaves today.
They also forget that this is also a fake narrative as only a minority of Jews owned slaves, and most didn't.
"Only a minority of white Southerners owned slaves, and most didn't." Known fact.
I would love to read a study on who did the slave trading and owning to/from/in North America, but I am aware that any such study would have an 80% chance of being tainted by bias, whether from Jews/Dems or neo-nazis.
It’s statistically more likely Rubinsteins ancestors owned more slaves than Madison. Then again we can talk about the overwhelmingly large amount of Jewish slave owners in America and globally? I think it’s time we force every minority to experience the cruelties their ancestors committed and then ask if they want to be white.
Rather, it's more likely that they were involved in the slave trade rather than in slave owning per se, the most cruel part of the slavery system. Middlemen everywhere engaged in trade in humans as though it was like trade in goods.
The mistake is to say that there was anything wrong in slavery at the time. It was simply what existed at the time. The people who judge people in the past for holding slaves are the same kind of people who insist that they would have been the exceptional anti-Nazi rebel - when in fact, their obedience to the norms of the CurrentYear demonstrates that back then, they would have obeyed the norms of the time.
It's also very funny some of these users claiming Jews owned slaves and act as if they are against it when these people have complete and utter disdain against black people. They would be slave owners if they could back then. In fact, if they could get away with it, these neonazis would own black slaves today.
They also forget that this is also a fake narrative as only a minority of Jews owned slaves, and most didn't.
"Only a minority of white Southerners owned slaves, and most didn't." Known fact.
I would love to read a study on who did the slave trading and owning to/from/in North America, but I am aware that any such study would have an 80% chance of being tainted by bias, whether from Jews/Dems or neo-nazis.