I'm sure they are. In fact, I know they are.

Fundamentally, thier actions and efforts are extremely subversive.

Put it like this: Poal gatekeeps. The welcome page of Poal greets you with a half-dozen former Voat members who will immediately throw antisemetic comments at you, and then basically move on and talk about other things.

But some of the people who come here from that forum aren't gatekeeping, they are subverting. Every single conversation is only about jews. Any user that disagrees is then told they are a kike, a nigger, a streetshitter, a shitskin, or any other rather uncomfortable racial pejorative they can summon that isn't an anti-white slur, and by 5-10 of them at a time. They aren't gatekeeping, they are socially enforcing a very specific narrative, and will do it with unrelenting verbal abuse.

This is one of the primary reasons for Rule 15. Racial and ethnic slurs are particularly egregious in most environments, and if you used them in a public setting, there's a real likelihood your slur would be followed up with social violence because it's so wildly inappropriate in any conversation, let alone towards people you've just met. The effort of dog-piling people with slurs, while making every topic about a race war meta-narrative, creates perpetual social enforcement by a kind of racial sharia. The purpose is to conquer every single available online space and make it ideologically homogenous. The problem is, because they are Leftists, they can't build anything, so as soon as they conqure it, it begins to die.

ConPro is exactly as you said, because it was subverted, and they weren't the only ones.