Why Islamic countries aren't susceptible to liberal BS
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
This video is just a microcosm of East v. West, of collectivism/communitarianism v. individualism/liberalism. The conflict between the two ways of life when they collide.
The empowered, emancipated, enlightened liberal woman expects to be included, only to be excluded by those kids who are preserving a clear friend-enemy distinction and asabiyyah (group solidarity) against the obvious ideological enemy and out-group member. I've never seen kids more based than these.
The average kid of that age where I am is just some disobedient, undisciplined, pampered little turd, who in a few years will be even worse than many of the current set of late modern scum. The kids in this video will beat those kids in any fair fight. They are simply smarter and stronger. They are about we and not I.
Now, the soy Twitter comments are hilarious. 'Me so smart, religion of peace is not really religion of peace!' level of discourse. Of course, the general Twittard is somebody radically Western to the point of often hating the West for not going far enough: extreme hyper-individualists wish to rid of the world of a large number of immutable things including entire emotions such as fear (muh phobias), hate (muh hate speech, hate group, etc.) and shame. They are simply at war with that which is innate, with nature. The same mindset leads them to attack race, anthropocentrism and, more recently, even the male-female distinction.
They really are at war with nature. It's especially obvious if you look at the links between trannsgenderism and transhumanism.
Yes, they feel enslaved by reality and/or nature and see it as something to be liberated from.
It started when they rebelled against the idea of a Creator God or Gods as a sort of authoritarian dictator(s) who did not create the cosmos in any democratic way—not consulting any of His creations as to what they wanted—and then it snowballed over the centuries into rebelling against biological distinctions and their own human limitations. They think, for example, that because real-life doesn't have a Character Creation screen like Fallout or Mass Effect, and that your real-life player character is essentially predetermined; well, even that is essentially authoritarianism.
You notice that both transsexualism and transhumanism are part of Man's attempt to edit his own self, exactly like player characters can after reaching certain points in games like Fallout: New Vegas. Same thing with the growing transracial and transspecies trends.
See, for example, this 'trans-Korean' Brit named 'Oli London': https://nypost.com/2021/06/28/oli-london-identifies-as-korean-after-surgeries-to-look-like-bts-jimin/
Also see this 'trans-Filipino' White male who now calls himself 'Ja Du' (I'm sure that no Filipino person even has a name like that, which makes his choice of name even stranger): https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/13/transracial-man-born-white-says-he-feels-filipino/858043001/
The Metaverse also relates to this. People want to withdraw ever-further into the extreme freedom offered by fantasy, virtual worlds because they feel enslaved by their essentially ascribed, immutable characteristics.
Persons bereft of personal qualities can roleplay as someone who has said qualities in abundance in virtual reality: where you can make an avatar that you find very handsome or strong or whatever you desire that a Creator God would have made you if He didn't make the 'mistakes' that late modern people think they are rectifying.
Indeed, that has practically become the purpose of late modern life: to 'find' or 'reveal' the 'real' self, a DIY project of perfecting the imperfect 'work in progress' that one begins life as.