To be clear the article doesn't directly advocate that "misogyny" result in gun seizures. But the implication is there, especially in the title. They're calling for
"misogyny" to be treated as mental illness, with the definition of "misogyny" being whatever they want it to be of course. This matters because mental illness is one of the disqualifiers for gun ownership. Right now it requires a court to condemn someone to a nuthouse for that legal provision to apply, but of course the left is always thinking up new dirty tricks to harm gun owners, with backstabbing cucks like Romney eager to help them. Expect this idea to come up more if they're able to scrap the due process protections involved in locking someone in a nuthouse and stripping their gun rights.
Men in general are more likely than women to take their own lives — the CDC determined in 2009 that the male suicide rate was four times that of women.
Stop pretending you care. If you actually gave a shit about men's mental health you wouldn't be on this decades long crusade to make their lives a living hell.
Viewing violence through the lens of misogyny gives us an opportunity to help everyone — women by preventing domestic violence, society by preventing mass shootings and men by freeing them from self-destructive masculinity.
Fuck off with this r/menslib tier shit. If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead. We also know that your gun seizure fantasies are a precursor to the genocide some of the more loose lipped members of your group can't shut up about.
Viewing violence through the lens of misogyny gives us an opportunity to help everyone — women by preventing domestic violence, society by preventing mass shootings and men by freeing them from self-destructive masculinity.
Aaaagh, this fucking bitch. Help women by increasing safety, help society by increased safety, help men by...neutering/changing them! Fuck you, get help, you're a cultist.
If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead.
Well said. So many of men's troubles stem from society being absolutely shit to them. Fuck off, pull back, allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism. That's the real irony; men aren't allowed to do their own thing, and they're also not allowed a collective identify, unless they admit it's "toxic" and work on "fixing" it. No wonder some men go fucking psycho. There's no place for men, and there's no purpose for men in the mainstream, unless they self flagellate.
P.S. Imp, this is your thread to shine, don't let us down, buddy. You got this. Don't sperg out on some random topic. We're all agreeing with you here. You can do it.
Even this isn't entirely correct. They still want men to have desires for them, because that gives them something to exploit. They just want compliant followers that will accept that women are their superiors. Everything they say about masculinity is purely to lead to this outcome.
allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism.
Women can't afford for men to check out of society, it only functions based off our willingness to work hard for a society that hates us and wishes we were all killed.
As for a positive collective male identity, they don't want to allow that in case it becomes a political bloc. This is why so many pieces by female authors push division by race, wealth and age, among others. Their strength is in their in-group bias, that women as a class will usually band together on major issues. They cannot afford men doing the same thing so they try everything to divide them.
self-flagellate
I often claim feminists are sadistic, and I think this is a sort of proof of that. It's not enough for you to follow what they want, you have to do that and hate yourself, be constantly reminded that you will never, ever be as good as a woman. That your existence is a curse and your original sin can never be atoned for.
To be clear the article doesn't directly advocate that "misogyny" result in gun seizures. But the implication is there, especially in the title. They're calling for "misogyny" to be treated as mental illness, with the definition of "misogyny" being whatever they want it to be of course. This matters because mental illness is one of the disqualifiers for gun ownership. Right now it requires a court to condemn someone to a nuthouse for that legal provision to apply, but of course the left is always thinking up new dirty tricks to harm gun owners, with backstabbing cucks like Romney eager to help them. Expect this idea to come up more if they're able to scrap the due process protections involved in locking someone in a nuthouse and stripping their gun rights.
Stop pretending you care. If you actually gave a shit about men's mental health you wouldn't be on this decades long crusade to make their lives a living hell.
Fuck off with this r/menslib tier shit. If you want to help men LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE! They know full well that you hate them and want them dead. We also know that your gun seizure fantasies are a precursor to the genocide some of the more loose lipped members of your group can't shut up about.
Aaaagh, this fucking bitch. Help women by increasing safety, help society by increased safety, help men by...neutering/changing them! Fuck you, get help, you're a cultist.
Well said. So many of men's troubles stem from society being absolutely shit to them. Fuck off, pull back, allow for more individualism or healthy collectivism. That's the real irony; men aren't allowed to do their own thing, and they're also not allowed a collective identify, unless they admit it's "toxic" and work on "fixing" it. No wonder some men go fucking psycho. There's no place for men, and there's no purpose for men in the mainstream, unless they self flagellate.
P.S. Imp, this is your thread to shine, don't let us down, buddy. You got this. Don't sperg out on some random topic. We're all agreeing with you here. You can do it.
Even this isn't entirely correct. They still want men to have desires for them, because that gives them something to exploit. They just want compliant followers that will accept that women are their superiors. Everything they say about masculinity is purely to lead to this outcome.
Women can't afford for men to check out of society, it only functions based off our willingness to work hard for a society that hates us and wishes we were all killed.
As for a positive collective male identity, they don't want to allow that in case it becomes a political bloc. This is why so many pieces by female authors push division by race, wealth and age, among others. Their strength is in their in-group bias, that women as a class will usually band together on major issues. They cannot afford men doing the same thing so they try everything to divide them.
I often claim feminists are sadistic, and I think this is a sort of proof of that. It's not enough for you to follow what they want, you have to do that and hate yourself, be constantly reminded that you will never, ever be as good as a woman. That your existence is a curse and your original sin can never be atoned for.