I challenge any doctor or retard who thinks they know science to tell me what part of the reproductive process is abortion, and why, if it is a safe and essential procedure that only one in four American women get one? Also the 8th and 14th amendments are completely nullified by allowing abortion practices to be legal. There is no legal argument that abortion is not cruel and unusual punishment, just as there is no legal argument that abortion doesn’t violate the equal protection clause and the concept of human ownership. The paper they claim is “science” never once argues that the fetus is not a living human, they instead argue “pain and viability” which is the most shallow argument alive. There is no such thing as a viable human by their standards, every human has required other humans to exist period. This is not limited to a fetus that requires others for sustenance. In fact viability would argue rationally that any child could be murdered for convenience under the law. Pain is another misnomer, “pain” is entirely irrelevant to living. These are the “top” of our medical community claiming the two determinants of life are the ability to survive independent of another person and the ability to say ow. I’m not joking…..
Wouldn't surprise me if there was number fudging happening somewhere/somehow that meant someone even just mentioning they are considering one will count.
I challenge any doctor or retard who thinks they know science to tell me what part of the reproductive process is abortion, and why, if it is a safe and essential procedure that only one in four American women get one? Also the 8th and 14th amendments are completely nullified by allowing abortion practices to be legal. There is no legal argument that abortion is not cruel and unusual punishment, just as there is no legal argument that abortion doesn’t violate the equal protection clause and the concept of human ownership. The paper they claim is “science” never once argues that the fetus is not a living human, they instead argue “pain and viability” which is the most shallow argument alive. There is no such thing as a viable human by their standards, every human has required other humans to exist period. This is not limited to a fetus that requires others for sustenance. In fact viability would argue rationally that any child could be murdered for convenience under the law. Pain is another misnomer, “pain” is entirely irrelevant to living. These are the “top” of our medical community claiming the two determinants of life are the ability to survive independent of another person and the ability to say ow. I’m not joking…..
I'm guessing one in a hundred get twenty-five instead. I simply do not believe that statistic.
I'm sure the number is inflated with miscarriages or other problems.
Wouldn't surprise me if there was number fudging happening somewhere/somehow that meant someone even just mentioning they are considering one will count.