You cited Scalia who said you must understand the verbiage in it’s time. How exactly do we verify this again? What other documents are the constitution put against again for verification of intent? It’s hilarious, your argument is anti originalist and you don’t even realize it because you haven’t bothered to read anything about federalism or originalist interpretation. We’re done here, actually read the documents you troglodyte, come back when you’re done with your book report for grading.