You "proved" your claim that no one wants women in power by providing ad hoc justifications for every case. "Well, the other one was BAD!"
Interestingly, Comrade Corbyn the open Communist came very, very close to defeating May, which further proves my point.
Wait, you're claiming that people voted against May because she was a woman? And then you still pretend that you're not a whining woman and feminist? Good one.
There's a difference between competing against a regular candidate and a communist wannabe that would lose to a random homeless person pulled off the street.
Partially - I think enough people recognize that women cannot be trusted with power, especially in the UK. This is why feminists puppeted Johnson. They aren't capable of wielding power without using it to satisfy their hatred of everything male and a good number of people understand that.
May herself was openly feminist, and I didn't trust her at all - but the communist was worse. I maintain that despite what happened, I did the right thing. Maybe I should have protest voted, but it was an important seat.
I think enough people recognize that women cannot be trusted with power
So you agree with feminists.
Remarkable how often that is the case.
Can you post a picture of your hands with a piece of paper specifying your username? I have strong suspicions that you are in fact a woman.
They aren't capable of wielding power without using it to satisfy their hatred of everything male and a good number of people understand that.
Literally no one believes that. Even the people who admit that they will not vote for women do not believe that. You're the only one, and even you pretend to believe that because you are an agent provocateur.
May herself was openly feminist, and I didn't trust her at all - but the communist was worse. I maintain that despite what happened, I did the right thing. Maybe I should have protest voted, but it was an important seat.
Given that Brexit was at stake, you did do the right thing.
You "proved" your claim that no one wants women in power by providing ad hoc justifications for every case. "Well, the other one was BAD!"
Wait, you're claiming that people voted against May because she was a woman? And then you still pretend that you're not a whining woman and feminist? Good one.
Have they ever won an election against competent opposition?
Well, Johnson performed far better against the same opponent.
Wow, the better candidate wins? My God. You keep hitting home runs with these comments of yours.
So just to be clear: you agree with feminists that people vote against women just because they are female?
There's a difference between competing against a regular candidate and a communist wannabe that would lose to a random homeless person pulled off the street.
Partially - I think enough people recognize that women cannot be trusted with power, especially in the UK. This is why feminists puppeted Johnson. They aren't capable of wielding power without using it to satisfy their hatred of everything male and a good number of people understand that.
May herself was openly feminist, and I didn't trust her at all - but the communist was worse. I maintain that despite what happened, I did the right thing. Maybe I should have protest voted, but it was an important seat.
So you agree with feminists.
Remarkable how often that is the case.
Can you post a picture of your hands with a piece of paper specifying your username? I have strong suspicions that you are in fact a woman.
Literally no one believes that. Even the people who admit that they will not vote for women do not believe that. You're the only one, and even you pretend to believe that because you are an agent provocateur.
Given that Brexit was at stake, you did do the right thing.