A big problem with trying to make racist slurs against Asians stick is, there's a good argument that in most ways they might be racially superior to Caucasoids.

Hey, now. There are good Asians, and there are bad Asians. There's a big difference.

The weird part is though, why do they thrive the best in cultures and societies that they did not create? Why does it take something the American founders created to permit the conditions for these genetic heavies to win?

A big issue there, is self-selection bias. A lot of the people that score the highest on such charts...were rich/successful enough to escape, for example, China, to begin with. I'm not saying Asians are worse than or better than anyone else, but there's a massive sampling issue if you're looking at immigrants to the US. They were often already successful before they even got here, often above average even within their own race.

It is interesting, though. Asians do seem to often accel in general, despite not having some of the other marks of genetic success, such as adapting to especially cold climes and struggling for survival. A lot of Asia is fairly lush, some even tropical. Yet they massively outperform other people who came up in a tropical climate, and even often outperform Hwites.

It's certainly an interesting discussion.