It's "slope faggot" rather than "faggot slope," at least, according to this:
Alright, thanks. I actually had it the other way, then changed it. "Slope faggot" sounds more ambiguous, at least to me. And that illustrates part of the issue with "slope" to begin with. "Slope faggot" sounds like some faggot that in some way involves inclines. I just wasn't happy with it. "Slant" is getting better. Unless something else comes along, I think that's the winner.
Problem being, Japanese are a pretty upright people. There aren't really any predilections or characteristics of them as a folk that are assailable. Other than physical characteristics, which are no different than any other Mongoloid, the only real thing I can think of is a) Post Pearl Harbor, people used to refer to them as "sneaky," and b) Most people were horrified by hara-kiri, or kamikaze, when it was used as a tactic.
Nowadays, it's just a based Country, except for the insanity happening in their metropolitan regions, which is happening all over the globe. They're Christian and Shintoist and Daoist and Buddhist and Confucian, in just about the right proportion that keeps them remarkably resistant to being huge pieces of shit, generally.
You ever see that joke from 30 Rock where Baldwin doesn't like calling Puerto Rican people "Puerto Rican," because something about it just seems like a slur? There's nothing like that with the Japanese. It's an inherently respectable cultural background, if you don't mind the war crimes.
That just makes me amused...but also rather, and legitimately sad.
I guess I should just call George Takei a fucking American faggot.
Shiiiiit.
I wanted to compete on racist grounds, since he was being a racist...but you're right. Japanese are pretty much okay, as I already knew. George should probably be more Japanese, not less.
Hey, I guess that works. If he's essentially calling Thomas a race traitor, there's my in. George Takei is a disgrace to his race. I think I finally did it. The best insult against a Japanese person is to say they're not sufficiency Japanese.
Unfortunately, yes. A big problem with trying to make racist slurs against Asians stick is, there's a good argument that in most ways they might be racially superior to Caucasoids. Genetically, selected for the attributes that lead to success in our most modern world. If you ignore temporal effects, like culture and social factors, it certainly seems like East Asians and Ashkenazi have the leg-up. What do you say? "You're too good at winning...um...bitch!"
The weird part is though, why do they thrive the best in cultures and societies that they did not create? Why does it take something the American founders created to permit the conditions for these genetic heavies to win? This is me thinking out loud, I am not making some Socratic argument here. The American founding fathers are fascinating. I wish I could make them make sense with my understanding of history, of culture, of history, of religion, and I just can't. It's just odd.
Something about this bothers me.
Right.
It's "slope faggot" rather than "faggot slope," at least, according to this:
https://owl.excelsior.edu/grammar-essentials/parts-of-speech/adjectives/order-of-adjectives/
Ooh, I remembered another, related to "slope." "Slant-eye." That might even work better; certainly sounds better, harsher: "Slant-eyed faggot."
Alright, thanks. I actually had it the other way, then changed it. "Slope faggot" sounds more ambiguous, at least to me. And that illustrates part of the issue with "slope" to begin with. "Slope faggot" sounds like some faggot that in some way involves inclines. I just wasn't happy with it. "Slant" is getting better. Unless something else comes along, I think that's the winner.
Problem being, Japanese are a pretty upright people. There aren't really any predilections or characteristics of them as a folk that are assailable. Other than physical characteristics, which are no different than any other Mongoloid, the only real thing I can think of is a) Post Pearl Harbor, people used to refer to them as "sneaky," and b) Most people were horrified by hara-kiri, or kamikaze, when it was used as a tactic.
Nowadays, it's just a based Country, except for the insanity happening in their metropolitan regions, which is happening all over the globe. They're Christian and Shintoist and Daoist and Buddhist and Confucian, in just about the right proportion that keeps them remarkably resistant to being huge pieces of shit, generally.
You ever see that joke from 30 Rock where Baldwin doesn't like calling Puerto Rican people "Puerto Rican," because something about it just seems like a slur? There's nothing like that with the Japanese. It's an inherently respectable cultural background, if you don't mind the war crimes.
Fuck. Fuck.
That just makes me amused...but also rather, and legitimately sad.
I guess I should just call George Takei a fucking American faggot.
Shiiiiit.
I wanted to compete on racist grounds, since he was being a racist...but you're right. Japanese are pretty much okay, as I already knew. George should probably be more Japanese, not less.
Hey, I guess that works. If he's essentially calling Thomas a race traitor, there's my in. George Takei is a disgrace to his race. I think I finally did it. The best insult against a Japanese person is to say they're not sufficiency Japanese.
Unfortunately, yes. A big problem with trying to make racist slurs against Asians stick is, there's a good argument that in most ways they might be racially superior to Caucasoids. Genetically, selected for the attributes that lead to success in our most modern world. If you ignore temporal effects, like culture and social factors, it certainly seems like East Asians and Ashkenazi have the leg-up. What do you say? "You're too good at winning...um...bitch!"
The weird part is though, why do they thrive the best in cultures and societies that they did not create? Why does it take something the American founders created to permit the conditions for these genetic heavies to win? This is me thinking out loud, I am not making some Socratic argument here. The American founding fathers are fascinating. I wish I could make them make sense with my understanding of history, of culture, of history, of religion, and I just can't. It's just odd.