I'm telling you, the Democrats are actually in league with organized crime.
This isn't new. There's no substantive difference between politicians working on behalf of the Genovese's, or working on behalf of Crips.
Yeah, sure, the Warren Court's soft-on-crime stuff ruined the country at the time and was ideologically based. But when Lori Lightfoot comes out saying that cops need to be protected from foot pursuits, that's bullshit. Looting supports the black market for stolen goods that every ghetto has. The distribution of needles supports durg addicts and keeps the drug market flowing. The importation of homeless from other cities increases sales to those same drug dealers.
We also know that the racial identitarians have deep rooted connections to organized crime. From any "La Raza" Latino organizations relationships to the cartels, Black Identiarians ties to the Nation Of Islam & Almighty Black P. Stone Nation. Hell we can even talk about Leftist "Indian Movements" with criminal gangs among natives. They formed political alliances though party-boss systems with Irish gangs, Ukranian gangs, Itanlian gangs, and yes even Jewish gangs.
It isn't about the race, it's about the racialism. It allows for cities to be balkanized ethnic districts that are solidly under the control of a party boss system, where the single identitarian politician is the only person who speaks the language of the people in that community, and is the sole arbiter of power in that community. He, therefore, controls a voting block at the larger scale. This has been the strategy in American cities for over 200 years, it involves Republicans and Democrats (though many of the Republicans were just Tammany Hall... located in NYC).
I'm telling you, they are operating at the behest of street gangs. That is why they are directly attacking the police from behind, so that those communities can be policed by their own local mafia.
I'm telling you, the Democrats are actually in league with organized crime.
This isn't new. There's no substantive difference between politicians working on behalf of the Genovese's, or working on behalf of Crips.
Yeah, sure, the Warren Court's soft-on-crime stuff ruined the country at the time and was ideologically based. But when Lori Lightfoot comes out saying that cops need to be protected from foot pursuits, that's bullshit. Looting supports the black market for stolen goods that every ghetto has. The distribution of needles supports durg addicts and keeps the drug market flowing. The importation of homeless from other cities increases sales to those same drug dealers.
We also know that the racial identitarians have deep rooted connections to organized crime. From any "La Raza" Latino organizations relationships to the cartels, Black Identiarians ties to the Nation Of Islam & Almighty Black P. Stone Nation. Hell we can even talk about Leftist "Indian Movements" with criminal gangs among natives. They formed political alliances though party-boss systems with Irish gangs, Ukranian gangs, Itanlian gangs, and yes even Jewish gangs.
It isn't about the race, it's about the racialism. It allows for cities to be balkanized ethnic districts that are solidly under the control of a party boss system, where the single identitarian politician is the only person who speaks the language of the people in that community, and is the sole arbiter of power in that community. He, therefore, controls a voting block at the larger scale. This has been the strategy in American cities for over 200 years, it involves Republicans and Democrats (though many of the Republicans were just Tammany Hall... located in NYC).
I'm telling you, they are operating at the behest of street gangs. That is why they are directly attacking the police from behind, so that those communities can be policed by their own local mafia.
Well, that system does provide a measure of electoral certainty, if you've got the lack of moral fortitude necessary to benefit from it.
So, then it's a virtual certainty.