The Supreme Court says they will review old bad decisions - here's one of the worst.
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Drafting women was backed by a review into it commissioned by the Department of Defense during the Trump Administration.
Not drafting women violates the basic principles of giving them a vote and allowing them into the military. If they can serve voluntarily, they can be forced. If they can vote for someone who starts a war, they can fight in it.
Go back to this and give the right ruling.
You know about the cold war, how the proliferation of nuclear weapons prevented anyone turning it into a hot war.
That was called the theory of Mutually Assured Destruction, or MAD for short.
Adding women to the draft is societal MAD. They can keep voting for war-mongering feminists like they do now, but they will be aware that that will result in their deaths as well as ours.
Should 80-year-olds be allowed to vote?
Yes, they already went through that period of risk of being sent to war.
Women never have and likely never will unless people wake the fuck up.
Wait, so once you're past the age of 40, you can vote for all the wars you want, without having to serve in them? That severely undermines your argument. After all, isn't your paranoid delusion that womens vote for wars in order to get men killed?
So why is it OK for those over 40 to vote to get younger generations killed, without fighting in them?
Didn't you predict that there would be a war in Taiwan this year if the female draft was not passed?
People have to have a stake in it somehow. Either them or their kids.