Correct. Essentially SCOTUS had originally interpreted RvW as being a constitutional issue and thusly abortion was included in the bill of rights. But, many experts contented that the interpretation was based on flawed reasoning. Now SCOTUS has reviewed the ruling and determined that RvW is not a constitutional issue putting the issue of abortion back in the states hands for their own legislative and judicial branches to rule and interpret.
Correct. Essentially SCOTUS had originally interpreted RvW as being a constitutional issue and thusly abortion was included in the bill of rights. But, many experts contented that the interpretation was based on flawed reasoning. Now SCOTUS has reviewed the ruling and determined that RvW is not a constitutional issue putting the issue of abortion back in the states hands for their own legislative and judicial branches to rule and interpret.
Hold on while I spend a couple of hours putting together a presentation for your lazy ass.