The she-covery - Female judge in Canada orders 50k a month in alimony payments.
(www.dailywire.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Yes, it's from over a year ago, but I wanted to prove this really does happen and that women see kindness as a weakness to exploit.
Women used the cover of the pandemic to get many laws passed that favored them, including massive changes to Canadian law on private property.
Did anyone come out of 2020 with more wins than them? I guess Moderna shareholders.
To be fair - its Canada. They voted for a literally mangina.
What specific kindness do you mean?
Just out of curiosity: what are those 'massive changes' to Canadian law?
Those are all women. The head of the Wuhan Institute of Virology tipped off the womens, so they bought up all the Moderna stock that they could find. They could not allow the gender they despise and want dead to profit from the virus they created to kill men.
Well, if you read the article, she used the extravagant gifts he bought her as a legal argument that she had been allowed his standard of living and this figure was fair.
I believe this is it? But it's not the right part of 2020 to what I remember reading. - Notice that the evil freaks attached a poison pill for opposition, making it cover wellbeing of disabled children so they could vilify anyone who rejected their idea that they are entitled to everyone's money by virtue of being women.
I mean, I wouldn't be so shocked if all the feminist organizations were tipped off by CDC Director Walensky on what would be approved, so they could grow their dirty money.
I'm guessing that this relationship was mostly transactional.
Yeah, it's in 2018, and it's not at all clear what it even does - and it's just for Alberta to boot. From what I gather, it specifies equal property division as the default, rather than something that has to be demonstrated.
Does the law state that only women have a right to half their common law partner's property upon a break-up?
I like my theory better.
All relationships with women are transactional. They believe themselves to be your superiors.
The end says the bill is due to come into force on January 1st 2020. But that's still not what I remembered. An actual Canadian would find it, I don't even know where to start.
It doesn't need to, that's how it will always be applied.
Mine is more realistic though.
Walensky and the feminist leaders are all from the same tribe, so it would surprise me if she wasn't colluding with them.