By definition, they are.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
and here we yet again see the conflation between "normal" and "okay". These assholes spent 2 decades telling us to accept the weird, and when we did, they then ordered us to stop calling it weird. There are 4 lights.
I would really like to be in a world where we accept the weird, but we still fucking call it weird, and weirdos have to simply acknowledge to themselves that they are indeed weirdos, and not normal.
I'm a fucking a weirdo in many ways - not gay, but I'm under no illusions that certain aspects of myself are unusual and even deleterious to myself. I would rather not be oppressed for it, but I also, actively, do not want my weirdness celebrated. Because I think a society that does anything more than largely ignore my weirdness as... fringe weirdo shit, is a society that's circling the drain.
Amen fellow weirdo, Amen.
That's my problem with this label; abnormal does not equal bad.
Regular excercise, in this day and age, is abnormal. Where I live, not being vaxxed is abnormal. Raising your kids outside of the public education system is abnormal etc, etc.
It also is a bit of a cop out. They're not actually saying it's bad either, just weird; what exactly are they implying?
I prefer the term hedonistic. There's no material benefit to society from homosexuality, it's purely for the enjoyment of those who partake. Therefore, while it shouldn't necessarily be banned (unless, you know, there was a good reason like our birth rates dropped below replacement levels), it should be treated like cigarettes, porn, or alcohol; no public advertising, possibly heavily taxed, and anyone pushing it on kids should be charged with child abuse.
The problem with letting people do degenerate things in the privacy of their homes is that they will eventually insist on making it public, and then making it mandatory.