The post was essentially 'yeah it sounds bad but I'll give it a look anyway. Can't let every online outrage merchant decide everything for me.'
The sentiment of that state isn't automatically bad, but when you've got something as blatant as this, you should know you're looking at the work of people who hate your guts and would string you up if they could.
The post was essentially 'yeah it sounds bad but I'll give it a look anyway. Can't let every online outrage merchant decide everything for me.'
The sentiment of that state isn't automatically bad, but when you've got something as blatant as this, you should know you're looking at the work of people who hate your guts and would string you up if they could.
Realistically, if at this stage you haven't developed a gut feeling that you can trust about this kind of shit, you deserve bad entertainment.
But I kinda gathered that was the gist of what he said, more curious about the response that was deleted.
"Can't let every online outrage merchant decide everything for me.'".
But they'll let every online propoganda hypemachine do it.