Except that wasn't the question I asked. Maybe I think you're provincial because you have trouble reading and can't back up your philosophy with any other than "lol you're dumb dumb".
It's okay to believe it's immoral to do harm even to lessen overall harm, for example not diverting the train to hit one person instead of five. But you don't seem to understand that there even is a larger context where the raped mother and society are harmed in ways lessened by aborting the rape baby. This is why you don't understand anything I've said.
That it's moral to harm some innocents to make the greater whole less harmed. It's "stupid" because it makes your views look provincial.
Except that wasn't the question I asked. Maybe I think you're provincial because you have trouble reading and can't back up your philosophy with any other than "lol you're dumb dumb".
Well regardless I have a suggestion for you: go rewatch Wrath of Khan and try to imagine yourself as Spock and really understand his motivation.
It's okay to believe it's immoral to do harm even to lessen overall harm, for example not diverting the train to hit one person instead of five. But you don't seem to understand that there even is a larger context where the raped mother and society are harmed in ways lessened by aborting the rape baby. This is why you don't understand anything I've said.