It's not backtracking. Obviously if you quote something to mock or criticize it, you're not endorsing it.
Even if you are endorsing a particular quote, that does not mean that you have been 'infiltrated'. Christ man, what is this.
She's a feminist. Yes.
Present the proof. Where has she advocated for that?
How does it affect me if feminists all get locked up? They radicalize in jail? It's possible, I suppose.
They're not jailed for being feminists, you dumbshit, but for pointing out that someone is a man. It's something that can be targeted against anyone with a brain. Apparently, you really are a troon shill then, if that does not concern you.
Take it to the Supreme Court - win 5-4 with Kavanaugh, Thomas, Gorsuch, Roberts and the other one I forget the name of. It's just that Roberts is a traitor.
Barrett literally wants you dead and tortured, and you call Roberts the traitor?
Also, as I've said previously - why did women only care about this sick practice when it started affecting them?
Same reason the rest of us started caring about this sick practice, because it was brought to our attention.
Have any of them advocated to stop telling boys to hate themselves yet?
Who told teen boys to hate themselves again?
If you support them, you're just becoming the enemy.
I do support them, always have and always will. If you regard me as the enemy, well then, that is all the more reason why you will remain a loser forever.
If you are endorsing people that you usually wouldn't support at all, it tells me there's something going on. If I suddenly started supporting some minor thing that feminists also support. (is there even one thing I agree on with them?) I'd hope people would call me on it and at least make sure I haven't been compromised.
It's an intrinsic part of feminism. It's like saying prove a Republican supports gun rights.
It's probably easier for me to sympathize with the victims of feminist conditioning than the feminists themselves. I'd probably not be able to accept a fucking woman LARPing as a man though.
Women did, they make up the vast majority of teachers.
You can't seriously stand with the people acting out their castration fantasies, who practically worshipped Lorena Bobbitt. That's what it all comes down to in the end. It's sadism disguised as advocacy. I want their victims to take them down.
If I suddenly started supporting some minor thing that feminists also support. (is there even one thing I agree on with them?)
Tons of stuff. You both think that there is an oppressor gender. You're the mirror image of feminists, just even crazier.
It's an intrinsic part of feminism. It's like saying prove a Republican supports gun rights.
No, some Republicans do not, just like some feminists do not. You just do not have the evidence for your wild claims. You just say stuff without evidence, like when you called K. Barnette a feminist.
I'd probably not be able to accept a fucking woman LARPing as a man though.
I would pay $1000 to see an encounter between you and a TIF.
Women did, they make up the vast majority of teachers.
You've not presented a shred of evidence though.
You can't seriously stand with the people acting out their castration fantasies, who practically worshipped Lorena Bobbitt.
Those who do, support her because they thought she was being abused by her husband, not because they love castration.
I want their victims to take them down.
And then "their" victims will take you down. Brilliant plan there.
But I think they are the oppressors. What I meant is if I ended up taking their side and fighting with them on anything, without logical justification.
Okay, bad example. I forgot how many Republicans are actually Democrats. Okay, it's like Democrats with abortion. It's non-negotiable.
"You will never be a man, pretending cutting your hair and wearing normal clothes makes you one is a fucking insult. You're the gender equivalent of a minstrel show. Get the fuck away from me and stop culturally appropriating my gender, you fucking birth defect." - I imagine I'd say something like this.
I need to show evidence of something so obvious that even normie politicians know it?
Convenient cover story that nobody sane should buy into.
Yes, that is what a mirror image is... what you have in common is that you regard an entire gender as the enemy.
What I meant is if I ended up taking their side and fighting with them on anything, without logical justification.
There is plenty of justification for opposing troonery though.
Okay, bad example. I forgot how many Republicans are actually Democrats. Okay, it's like Democrats with abortion. It's non-negotiable.
Ironically, Henry Cuellar just won in Texas. Still, there are many rank-and-file Democratic pro-lifers. You cannot tell someone's positions based on mere affiliation. Some feminists want men to die, others want troons out of their spaces, while others are under a misprision as to what mainstream feminism really is.
"You will never be a man, pretending cutting your hair and wearing normal clothes makes you one is a fucking insult. You're the gender equivalent of a minstrel show. Get the fuck away from me and stop culturally appropriating my gender, you fucking birth defect." - I imagine I'd say something like this.
Now this is an Imp that I like. I am quite fond of using what they say about cultural approporiation: "my gender is not your costume".
I need to show evidence of something so obvious that even normie politicians know it?
That 'women' tell boys to 'hate themselves'?
Convenient cover story that nobody sane should buy into.
Whether it is or not, it's a fact that they believe it. A good argument would be: "hey, since you apparently believe any claim of abuse, this would entitle anyone to do this." Bad argument is: "WOMEN BAD".
At the very least, I'll live to see them fall.
How exactly are you going to defeat a majority of the population, when all the elites and institutions are against you, and you can get barely any support from the right-most section of the population?
Even if you are endorsing a particular quote, that does not mean that you have been 'infiltrated'. Christ man, what is this.
Present the proof. Where has she advocated for that?
They're not jailed for being feminists, you dumbshit, but for pointing out that someone is a man. It's something that can be targeted against anyone with a brain. Apparently, you really are a troon shill then, if that does not concern you.
Barrett literally wants you dead and tortured, and you call Roberts the traitor?
Same reason the rest of us started caring about this sick practice, because it was brought to our attention.
Who told teen boys to hate themselves again?
I do support them, always have and always will. If you regard me as the enemy, well then, that is all the more reason why you will remain a loser forever.
I don't care. I care about cannon fodder.
If you are endorsing people that you usually wouldn't support at all, it tells me there's something going on. If I suddenly started supporting some minor thing that feminists also support. (is there even one thing I agree on with them?) I'd hope people would call me on it and at least make sure I haven't been compromised.
It's an intrinsic part of feminism. It's like saying prove a Republican supports gun rights.
It's probably easier for me to sympathize with the victims of feminist conditioning than the feminists themselves. I'd probably not be able to accept a fucking woman LARPing as a man though.
Women did, they make up the vast majority of teachers.
You can't seriously stand with the people acting out their castration fantasies, who practically worshipped Lorena Bobbitt. That's what it all comes down to in the end. It's sadism disguised as advocacy. I want their victims to take them down.
Tons of stuff. You both think that there is an oppressor gender. You're the mirror image of feminists, just even crazier.
No, some Republicans do not, just like some feminists do not. You just do not have the evidence for your wild claims. You just say stuff without evidence, like when you called K. Barnette a feminist.
I would pay $1000 to see an encounter between you and a TIF.
You've not presented a shred of evidence though.
Those who do, support her because they thought she was being abused by her husband, not because they love castration.
And then "their" victims will take you down. Brilliant plan there.
But I think they are the oppressors. What I meant is if I ended up taking their side and fighting with them on anything, without logical justification.
Okay, bad example. I forgot how many Republicans are actually Democrats. Okay, it's like Democrats with abortion. It's non-negotiable.
"You will never be a man, pretending cutting your hair and wearing normal clothes makes you one is a fucking insult. You're the gender equivalent of a minstrel show. Get the fuck away from me and stop culturally appropriating my gender, you fucking birth defect." - I imagine I'd say something like this.
I need to show evidence of something so obvious that even normie politicians know it?
Convenient cover story that nobody sane should buy into.
At the very least, I'll live to see them fall.
Yes, that is what a mirror image is... what you have in common is that you regard an entire gender as the enemy.
There is plenty of justification for opposing troonery though.
Ironically, Henry Cuellar just won in Texas. Still, there are many rank-and-file Democratic pro-lifers. You cannot tell someone's positions based on mere affiliation. Some feminists want men to die, others want troons out of their spaces, while others are under a misprision as to what mainstream feminism really is.
Now this is an Imp that I like. I am quite fond of using what they say about cultural approporiation: "my gender is not your costume".
That 'women' tell boys to 'hate themselves'?
Whether it is or not, it's a fact that they believe it. A good argument would be: "hey, since you apparently believe any claim of abuse, this would entitle anyone to do this." Bad argument is: "WOMEN BAD".
How exactly are you going to defeat a majority of the population, when all the elites and institutions are against you, and you can get barely any support from the right-most section of the population?