Fucking global genocide isn't legal. It's the crime not seen since 1945.
The Berlin Airlift risked your "nuclear war", yes.
What fucking influence, when the Palis won't stop biting the literal hand feeding them and stop chanting "death to America"? The "red blooded Americans" might have been shocked by the TV pictured of the 9/11 celebrations that the Palis held in the streets in 2001 but they don't even know their tax money is feeding these ingrates and keeping them alive.
Without American global aid, there would be millions starving around the world every year. Led the UN to war in fucking Somalia for no other reason but just to feed them (then took loads of them as refugees), instead of letting them die because black lives matter lol
The Afghans have been starving before America came and make them fed, and they still hated the Americans anyway. The Talis stole loads of American weapons, maybe they should try and trade them for food now. For once exporting something else than drugs.
You've put 'Zelensky' in just these quote marks, I tried to guess why would you do such a thing
I thought we just talked about how unarmed they were. How their best missiles were supposed to be export only and so are in Atabic. How they're low on ammunition after just 3 months, while Russia isn't (despite having almost depleted their Cold War stocks earlier in Chechnya and then recently delivering shiploads to Syria to lliterally level the cities there). All that stuff. Of course you forgot already.
Fucking global genocide isn't legal. It's the crime not seen since 1945.
Can you not cite anything in international law that disallows blockading if it results in negative consequences for third parties, as it always does?
Also, if this is 'genocide', doesn't that mean that the US is aiding genocide by telling them not to take grain from Russia?
The Berlin Airlift risked your "nuclear war", yes.
So they would not have to give up control over Berlin. Yes.
Without American global aid, there would be millions starving around the world every year.
Perhaps, but that certainly is not done out of any humanitarian motive. That is not even a consideration. Not for America, nor for Russia, nor for any other country. It's all Realpolitik and raison d'etat, nothing else.
Led the UN to war in fucking Somalia for no other reason but just to feed them (then took loads of them as refugees), instead of letting them die because black lives matter lol
After letting blacks be massacred in Rwanda. Yes, it was a cheap PR victory, that turned into a PR disaster - so they stopped.
The Talis stole loads of American weapons
Isn't that the stuff they just abandoned? How is that 'theft'? You can make the argument about the reserves, but not about the weapons America's allies left on the battlefield. What is it called, res relicta?
You've put 'Zelensky' in just these quote marks, I tried to guess why would you do such a thing
And you figured that because George Bush was totally talking to the real Zelensky, it must have been anti-Semitism. Rest assured that if I did hate Jews, I'd definitely be on Ukraine's side - Russians play a game of 'find the Ukrainian soldier without the Nazi insignia'. On Victory Day, Zelensky posted an image of a guy with Nazi symbols. Even NATO posted an image with Nazi symbols for International Women's Day.
Reuters posted an article with a picture of a guy who had a Nazi tattoo without any comment, because hey, he's allied with the Western oligarchies.
I thought we just talked about how unarmed they were. How their best missiles were supposed to be export only and do are in Atabic. How they're low on ammunition after just 3 months, while Russia isn't (despite having almost depleted their Cold War stocks earlier in Chechnya and then recently delivering shiploads to Syria to lliterally level the cities there). All that stuff. Of course you forgot already.
Because I'm not sure if it's true. And if the world's bullies had not been sending them weapons full-time, they would have run out much sooner.
Did the Russians really spend all their Cold War stocks in Chechnya? Sounds improbable, but if so, the USSR really was a paper tiger.
Fuck their empire.
I'm more concerned with the US imposing its will on countries around the world than with Russia interfering in its own backyard.
No, before "letting blacks be massacred in Rwanda" (if you mean 1994). And Rwanda was formerly Belgian but then practically French. It's also a lot more complicated than you even think. Because it was actually a bizarre French-American proxy war of sorts. (Americans though Uganda.) Not looking good for America at all, but for wholly different reasons you think
Literal armed robbery, this sort of theft. It wasn't abandoned, it was given to the government. And thousands of government people have been killed by the T-party during the takeover.
Besides, why can't their own friends in Russia and China feed them? Why is it American job to even literally feed the enemy?
While the Russians filmed themselves giving a medal for "denazification" in Mariupol to a smiling guy with Nazi insignia on his uniform. A member of Rusich, a Russian Nordic Pagan Hitlerite group.
"World's villains" had to wait for Trump to begin sending any weapons at all. Go and check what and how much had been delivered yourself.
Russian artillery in Chechnya retired to using shells from the 1960s and 1950s with a ridicalous dud rate (like 1 in 3) because they shot themselves dry of anything remotely new. They also spent all of their very few guided bombs. Now they just use dumb bombs with an advanced targeting system calculating the path, no laser guided bombs at all anymore. (They do use laser guided arty shells, the Soviet-era Krasnopol system still being produced.)
Besides, why can't their own friends in Russia and China feed them? Why is it American job to even literally feed the enemy?
Because it's in the interests of the Americans to do it.
While the Russians filmed themselves giving a medal for "denazification" in Mariupol to a smiling guy with Nazi insignia on his uniform. A member of Rusich, a Russian Nordic Pagan Hitlerite group.
OK, so you're not actually questioning the fact that nearly all Ukrainian soldiers appear to have Nazi insignia, tattoos, Bandera worship, etc. - just an is quoque.
Note that I don't care about their Nazi insignia. Only insofar as it shows that the regimes in the West are hypocrites, but so much was obvious already.
"World's villains" had to wait for Trump to begin sending any weapons at all. Go and check what and how much had been delivered yourself.
They pressured Trump with Russiagate to send offensive weapons to Ukraine. And apparently enough to make Lindsey Graham say that "2017 will be the year of offense" and Adam Schiff that "we send weapons to Ukraine so that we fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here". And you're surprised that Russia does not tolerate this? It's open warmongering.
Russian artillery in Chechnya retired to using shells from the 1960s and 1950s with a ridicalous dud rate (like 1 in 3) because they shot themselves dry of anything remotely new.
OK, so Russia is not a threat to anyone. So no need for the constant warmongering or any sort of support for the Banderistas.
Fucking global genocide isn't legal. It's the crime not seen since 1945.
The Berlin Airlift risked your "nuclear war", yes.
What fucking influence, when the Palis won't stop biting the literal hand feeding them and stop chanting "death to America"? The "red blooded Americans" might have been shocked by the TV pictured of the 9/11 celebrations that the Palis held in the streets in 2001 but they don't even know their tax money is feeding these ingrates and keeping them alive.
Without American global aid, there would be millions starving around the world every year. Led the UN to war in fucking Somalia for no other reason but just to feed them (then took loads of them as refugees), instead of letting them die because black lives matter lol
The Afghans have been starving before America came and make them fed, and they still hated the Americans anyway. The Talis stole loads of American weapons, maybe they should try and trade them for food now. For once exporting something else than drugs.
You've put 'Zelensky' in just these quote marks, I tried to guess why would you do such a thing
I thought we just talked about how unarmed they were. How their best missiles were supposed to be export only and so are in Atabic. How they're low on ammunition after just 3 months, while Russia isn't (despite having almost depleted their Cold War stocks earlier in Chechnya and then recently delivering shiploads to Syria to lliterally level the cities there). All that stuff. Of course you forgot already.
Fuck their empire.
Can you not cite anything in international law that disallows blockading if it results in negative consequences for third parties, as it always does?
Also, if this is 'genocide', doesn't that mean that the US is aiding genocide by telling them not to take grain from Russia?
So they would not have to give up control over Berlin. Yes.
Perhaps, but that certainly is not done out of any humanitarian motive. That is not even a consideration. Not for America, nor for Russia, nor for any other country. It's all Realpolitik and raison d'etat, nothing else.
After letting blacks be massacred in Rwanda. Yes, it was a cheap PR victory, that turned into a PR disaster - so they stopped.
Isn't that the stuff they just abandoned? How is that 'theft'? You can make the argument about the reserves, but not about the weapons America's allies left on the battlefield. What is it called, res relicta?
And you figured that because George Bush was totally talking to the real Zelensky, it must have been anti-Semitism. Rest assured that if I did hate Jews, I'd definitely be on Ukraine's side - Russians play a game of 'find the Ukrainian soldier without the Nazi insignia'. On Victory Day, Zelensky posted an image of a guy with Nazi symbols. Even NATO posted an image with Nazi symbols for International Women's Day.
Reuters posted an article with a picture of a guy who had a Nazi tattoo without any comment, because hey, he's allied with the Western oligarchies.
Because I'm not sure if it's true. And if the world's bullies had not been sending them weapons full-time, they would have run out much sooner.
Did the Russians really spend all their Cold War stocks in Chechnya? Sounds improbable, but if so, the USSR really was a paper tiger.
I'm more concerned with the US imposing its will on countries around the world than with Russia interfering in its own backyard.
No, before "letting blacks be massacred in Rwanda" (if you mean 1994). And Rwanda was formerly Belgian but then practically French. It's also a lot more complicated than you even think. Because it was actually a bizarre French-American proxy war of sorts. (Americans though Uganda.) Not looking good for America at all, but for wholly different reasons you think
Literal armed robbery, this sort of theft. It wasn't abandoned, it was given to the government. And thousands of government people have been killed by the T-party during the takeover.
Besides, why can't their own friends in Russia and China feed them? Why is it American job to even literally feed the enemy?
While the Russians filmed themselves giving a medal for "denazification" in Mariupol to a smiling guy with Nazi insignia on his uniform. A member of Rusich, a Russian Nordic Pagan Hitlerite group.
"World's villains" had to wait for Trump to begin sending any weapons at all. Go and check what and how much had been delivered yourself.
Russian artillery in Chechnya retired to using shells from the 1960s and 1950s with a ridicalous dud rate (like 1 in 3) because they shot themselves dry of anything remotely new. They also spent all of their very few guided bombs. Now they just use dumb bombs with an advanced targeting system calculating the path, no laser guided bombs at all anymore. (They do use laser guided arty shells, the Soviet-era Krasnopol system still being produced.)
Because it's in the interests of the Americans to do it.
OK, so you're not actually questioning the fact that nearly all Ukrainian soldiers appear to have Nazi insignia, tattoos, Bandera worship, etc. - just an is quoque.
Note that I don't care about their Nazi insignia. Only insofar as it shows that the regimes in the West are hypocrites, but so much was obvious already.
They pressured Trump with Russiagate to send offensive weapons to Ukraine. And apparently enough to make Lindsey Graham say that "2017 will be the year of offense" and Adam Schiff that "we send weapons to Ukraine so that we fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here". And you're surprised that Russia does not tolerate this? It's open warmongering.
OK, so Russia is not a threat to anyone. So no need for the constant warmongering or any sort of support for the Banderistas.
Also you're actually downvoting my replies lmao
That's like peak faggot, just in time for this month of the year
I don't think I've ever downvoted any your replies, ever, and neither did I do it here.
Do you think you're being rational and fair here? In case you actually believed this, look at your downvoted comment in question now.